Answer:
Listeners benefit from listening:
(i)When the narrator emphasizes key words ,
(ii)when the narrator pauses for effect, and
(iii) when sound effects are used.
Explanation:
Generally, when the narrator emphasizes key words then he wants the listeners to benefit more by listening to what he is emphasizing on for future usages. Also, when the narrator pauses during a lecture or presentation, he hopes the listener could digest what he has just said and would be able to save it to memory for future uses.
When sound effects are used in a lecture or presentation by a narrator, the listener tend to benefit more because the sound takes the better part of the listeners sense of hearing and thus enhances listening and comprehensions.
These three are the best options for the listeners to benefit when listening to a narrator during a presentation or narration to the audience.
Explanation:
Contents
News
Careers
Journals
Reducing the Impact of Negative Stereotypes on the Careers of Minority and Women Scientists
By Daisy GrewalNov. 26, 2010 , 10:00 AM

Social science research powerfully demonstrates how stereotypes, even those that people are not consciously aware of, can influence the careers of women and minorities. For example, people rate the quality of a scientific paper differently depending on whether they think a man or a woman wrote it. Stereotypes also reduce the self-esteem, motivation, and intellectual performance of women and minorities through a process called stereotype threat. Stereotype threat reduces performance in situations where an individual might confirm a negative stereotype about his or her group. In one example, researchers found that African-American college students performed worse on an SAT test when the students had been told that the test is a valid measure of intelligence.
<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.
Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.
Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>
<span>I found the excerpt you are referring to. In her story "Games at Twilight", these 3 sentences - All this time no one had remembered Ravi. Having disappeared from the scene, he had disappeared from their minds. Clean. - suggest that the children had completely forgotten about Ravi. The sentences obviously stated that the children didn't remember about Ravi. </span>
Interesting, but why do you ask the question? Do you need help with math or English? I am confused
