1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valina [46]
3 years ago
15

PLEASEEEEEE ANSWER! I NEED THIS SOON! How is a direct democracy similar to a representative democracy? A.) Both types of governm

ent are run by a communist party. B.) Both types of democracy give power to the people. C.) Both types of democracy give power only to elected representatives. D.
) Both types of government are run by a single party
History
2 answers:
FrozenT [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

You don't have to believe me, but i think the answer is, c.

Gnom [1K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Both types of democracies give power to the people.  All other choices are either incorrect or portray anti-democracy ideals.

You might be interested in
What letter is France?<br> A<br> B<br> C<br> D<br> Enter
kenny6666 [7]

Answer:D

Explanation:

France is touching italy!

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help!!!!!!<br> ASAP!!!
OleMash [197]

Answer: 3

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How does darius justify hi assumption of power in the behistun inscription? what is his relationship to ahuramazda, the zoroastr
Anni [7]
Pericles was more of politician while Confucius has been classified by many as a philosopher. The idea that they had different positions and were from very different parts of the world made them very distinct figures. Pericles was more academic and war oriented focusing on establishing sound social and political structures. Confucius promoted the goodness in people and the service to others as a way to be spiritually free.
3 0
3 years ago
Why do you think Stalin decided to form a pact with Hitler in August 1939?
anastassius [24]

On this day in 1939, Germany and the Soviet Union sign a non-aggression pact, stunning the world, given their diametrically opposed ideologies. But the dictators were, despite appearances, both playing to their own political needs.

After Nazi Germany’s invasion of Czechoslovakia, Britain had to decide to what extent it would intervene should Hitler continue German expansion. Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, at first indifferent to Hitler’s capture of the Sudetenland, the German-speaking area of Czechoslovakia, suddenly snapped to life when Poland became threatened. He made it plain that Britain would be obliged to come to the aid of Poland in the event of German invasion. But he wanted, and needed, an ally. The only power large enough to stop Hitler, and with a vested interest in doing so, was the Soviet Union. But Stalin was cool to Britain after its effort to create a political alliance with Britain and France against Germany had been rebuffed a year earlier. Plus, Poland’s leaders were less than thrilled with the prospect of Russia becoming its guardian; to them, it was simply occupation by another monstrous regime.

Hitler believed that Britain would never take him on alone, so he decided to swallow his fear and loathing of communism and cozy up to the Soviet dictator, thereby pulling the rug out from the British initiative. Both sides were extremely suspicious of the other, trying to discern ulterior motives. But Hitler was in a hurry; he knew if he was to invade Poland it had to be done quickly, before the West could create a unified front. Agreeing basically to carve up parts of Eastern Europe—and leave each other alone in the process—Hitler’s foreign minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, flew to Moscow and signed the non-aggression pact with his Soviet counterpart, V.M. Molotov (which is why the pact is often referred to as the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact). Supporters of bolshevism around the world had their heretofore romantic view of “international socialism” ruined; they were outraged that Stalin would enter into any kind of league with the fascist dictator.

But once Poland was German-occupied territory, the alliance would not last for long.

4 0
4 years ago
What was the major weakness of the Articles of Confederation/11371366/2686de78?utm_source=registration?
anastassius [24]
No brothel services was a major weakness
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 5 subtracted from 1/3 of 20
    13·2 answers
  • Which country is dealing with an independent movement totally based upon language
    12·2 answers
  • Who was the branch of armed forces that fights at sea?
    5·1 answer
  • Explain how water use is different today and how acequia societies are struggling to preserve their old ways.
    6·2 answers
  • Why did the italians and germans support francisco franco in the spanish civil war?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the language for Canada
    11·2 answers
  • What branch has the power to declare war
    12·2 answers
  • Define Latent heat of fusion of ice
    5·1 answer
  • What is the Reform Act of 1832?
    15·1 answer
  • All of the following were reasons for the growing anger of the plebeian class by the 200s
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!