The problem boils down to money, but I am assuming you are looking for the causes of the problem.
<span>1. Social Security was never indexed correctly to accommodate the growing life expectancy on those drawing on it. The age at which you can collect should have changed in concert with the life expectancy of the population, or the amount of the benefits should have been decreased if they wanted to keep the age at which you receive it from keeping pace with lefe expectancy. </span>
<span>2. The growth in income inequality has led to vast amounts of money being earned by fewer people and the tax on social security has a limit so any income over the limit is not subject to the tax. Right now that cap is around 109k/year...so someone making 125k/year pays the same amount into social security as someone making 10 million a year. As more wealth is concentrated with fewer people, even vast increases in income and/or wealth yields little increase to the amount collected via the SS tax. </span>
<span>3. Not necessarily on the scale as 1 and 2 above but fraud is also a cause of the monetary shortfall. There are those that cheat the system. Every so often you will hear stories of people getting caught in social security fraud rings where they collect either through identity theft or other criminal means. You also have people that will collect when a relative passes away. They will purposely not report the death or provide invalid SS information so they will continue to receive the deceased person's benefits long after they have died. </span>
<span>As far as a solution, you are stuck with the eventuality of either decreasing benefits, raising the retirement age, or increasing the amount of taxes collected...none of which are likely to fly in Congress. Programs like SS rely on growing the base of people from which you are collecting, but at some point this does not happen. Population growth is not automatic and even with population growth, the concentration of income at the top percent of people offsets any such growth. It may be considered a very progressive/liberal thought, but eliminating the cap on income from which SS tax is collected would help. You can still keep the cap on SS benefits meaning the people at the top of the income ladder would be paying far more than they would get out of it in 10 lifetimes...but this would neutralize the income inequality impact on the system. To be honest, if there was an easy solution, we would have done it by now.</span>
A deaf club is a place where Deaf people could meet to socialize, share news, organize political issues and thoughts, plan events and watch movies.
The greatest venue for hearing people learning Sign Language in official lessons to hone their signing abilities and fluency is a Deaf club. After Deaf schools, deaf clubs are the second-most significant gathering place in terms of culture.
Additionally, Deaf clubs provide hearing people with information on Deaf culture and history, serve as role models for young deaf children and their families, and preserve and transmit Deaf culture to future generations.
Learn more about deaf here:
brainly.com/question/9173583
#SPJ9
Answer:
Aesthetic Distance
Explanation:
Artists will often portray fictional, mythical, and also reality-based scenarios but it is the attitude they generate with their artwork that enables viewers to separate their life issues and come to a new dimension.
This attitude or experience when someone is captivated by a work of art, like when watching an opera or a play in theatre where the person loses conscious of her life for a time and sets apart reality in a fiction or different reality that the artist is trying to portray.
In a work of art, the narrative being capable of mark a distance and set the person apart into a magical world where other possibilities of reality exist is then called aesthetic distance.
Decreased risk of injury, increased bone density and strength and reduced osteoporosis
