The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options, we can say that the type of terrorist group that is responsible for the most lethal terrorist attacks (number of wounded and killed per attack), according to the dataset used by James Piazza is Islamist terrorism.
In the article "Is Islamist Terrorism More dangerous?" Piazza studies all of the elements that surround these dangerous terrorist cells such as their ideology, motives, cell structure, and goals. In his research, Piazza found to kinds of terrorist cells -both dangerous but with different motives. One is a type of a "strategic group," name deliberately chosen by Piazza; and "Abstract or Universal groups," more related to the type of al Qaeda terrorist cell. Piazza is a committed researcher that has analyzed more than 80,000 terrorist attacks from 1970 to 2016.
Mountain hills and deserts helped the Chinese to thrive mostly because it protected them from invasion quite well.
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
