1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artist 52 [7]
3 years ago
8

What was Jefferson's alternative to going to war with Great Britain?

History
2 answers:
makvit [3.9K]3 years ago
6 0

The Embargo Acts. C)

Levart [38]3 years ago
5 0
Embargo acts was his alternative
You might be interested in
based on the miranda warning that is evolved from the supreme court case miranda v. arizona,what rights is a person entitled to
Bess [88]

The Miranda warning used by law enforcement lists several different things that citizens are entitled to including:

1) The right to remain silent- Individuals are warned that anything they say can be used against them in a court of law.

2) Right to an attorney- Individuals can have legal counsel with them throughout the process.

Individuals who are being arrested for a crime are made aware of these rights. This warning allows individuals to understand what the procedures are after the arrest and what rights they have throughout the process. These rights are used as a means to ensure that the suspect understands what is happening and it prevents law enforcement officials from violating a citizens rights.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who invented the telephone
DerKrebs [107]

Alexander Graham Bell

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What could be a result of a government not adhering to the rule of law? (Select all that apply.)
soldi70 [24.7K]

The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

<em>The results of a government </em><u><em>NOT ADHERING</em></u><em> to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.</em>

The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.

So The results of a government <em><u>NOT ADHERING</u></em> to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Kent worked in the housewares section of a department store. This year he set a record high for vacuum sales with 567 vacuums so
timofeeve [1]
The percent of increase in sales from last year to this year is 5%.

Since the current vacuum sales is compared to the previous vacuum sales, the previous vacuum sales will be used as the basis of either increase or decrease of sales in the current year. In this instance, it is increase in sales.

We simply divide 567 by 540 and multiply the quotient with 100% and deduct 100% from the product to get the percent increase.

567 / 540 = 1.05 x 100% = 105% - 100% = 5% percent of increase.

or simply get the difference in sales and divide it by the previous sales and multiply by 100%

567 - 540 = 27 / 540 = 0.05 x 100% = 5%
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Before September 1939 the European response to Hitler's actions included
9966 [12]
The correct answer is statement #1.

Before Nazi Germany invaded Poland, Europeans followed a policy of appeasement. Appeasement is a policy that involves being passive towards the actions of another country. This was exemplified by the Munich Agreement in September of 1938. This agreement allowed Germany to take over parts of Czechoslovakia. The goal was to please Hitler so that he would not invade other countries. However, this appeasement policy had the opposite effect.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • what is one of Buddha's noble eightfold paths to relive suffering and end of desire is to ?? A. pray to Buddha B. meditate C. gi
    13·2 answers
  • Which explains why Supreme Court justices are given lifetime appointments?
    10·2 answers
  • What was not a factor that encouraged settlement in the west in the late 1800s
    12·1 answer
  • What does the man reaction reveal about him
    11·1 answer
  • The title "Commander-in-Chief" belongs to
    12·2 answers
  • ? What political promise made Mussolini and his Fascist Party popular in the 1920s?
    11·1 answer
  • What does it mean to be anti American
    10·1 answer
  • What were the 3 major events in 1619?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the difference between foreign policy and domestic policy? *
    10·1 answer
  • Give me 4 conclusion about the Another Wave Reforms
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!