1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivahew [28]
3 years ago
15

CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE!!!!

History
1 answer:
snow_tiger [21]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Battle of Fort Sumter (April 12–13, 1861) was the bombardment of Fort Sumter near Charleston, South Carolina by the South Carolina militia (the Confederate Army did not yet exist), and the return gunfire and subsequent surrender by the United States Army, that started the American Civil War.

Following the declaration of secession by South Carolina on December 20, 1860, its authorities demanded that the U.S. Army abandon its facilities in Charleston Harbor. On December 26, Major Robert Anderson of the U.S. Army surreptitiously moved his small command from the vulnerable Fort Moultrie on Sullivan's Island to Fort Sumter, a substantial fortress built on an island controlling the entrance of Charleston Harbor. An attempt by U.S. President James Buchanan to reinforce and resupply Anderson using the unarmed merchant ship Star of the West failed when it was fired upon by shore batteries on January 9, 1861. South Carolina authorities then seized all Federal property in the Charleston area except for Fort Sumter.

During the early months of 1861, the situation around Fort Sumter increasingly began to resemble a siege. In March, Brigadier General P. G. T. Beauregard, the first general officer of the newly formed Confederate States Army, was placed in command of Confederate forces in Charleston. Beauregard energetically directed the strengthening of batteries around Charleston harbor aimed at Fort Sumter. Conditions in the fort deteriorated due to shortages of men, food, and supplies as the Union soldiers rushed to complete the installation of additional guns.

The resupply of Fort Sumter became the first crisis of the administration of the newly inaugurated U.S. President Abraham Lincoln following his victory in the election of November 6, 1860. He notified the Governor of South Carolina, Francis W. Pickens, that he was sending supply ships, which resulted in an ultimatum from the Confederate government for the immediate evacuation of Fort Sumter, which Major Anderson refused. Beginning at 4:30 a.m. on April 12, the Confederates bombarded the fort from artillery batteries surrounding the harbor. Although the Union garrison returned fire, they were significantly outgunned and, after 34 hours, Major Anderson agreed to evacuate. There were no deaths on either side as a direct result of this engagement, although a gun explosion during the surrender ceremonies on April 14 caused the death of two U.S. Army soldiers.

Following the battle, there was widespread support from both North and South for further military action. Lincoln's immediate call for 75,000 volunteers to suppress the rebellion resulted in an additional four Southern states also declaring their secession and joining the Confederacy. The battle is usually recognized as the first battle that opened the American Civil War.

You might be interested in
Internationalists claimed that the untied states could avoid war if it
levacccp [35]
The answer is most likely D. Refused aid to any nation at war. If the U.S. remained neutral, it would not have to worry about going to war/being attacked by a nation at war with another.
Hope this helps! Brainliest is always appreciated!
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was a
Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

Militarism.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The holocaust began with the passage of which of the following in germany?
Zarrin [17]

The holocaust began with the passage of which Nuremberg Laws in Germany.

<h3>What happened during holocaust?</h3>

Holocaust is a period in which an estimated 6 million Jews were killed by a dictator. It was a period in history at the time of World War Two (1939-1945), when millions of Jews were murdered because of who they were.

The Nuremberg Laws is what defined a Jewish person by the person's ancestry. This means that if someone had a Jewish ancestor and it was recorded in the documentations, than that persons was identified as Jewish, even though that person might have identified as other ethnicity, and was not practicing Judaism as its religion, it didn't matter.

The next step after the identification of the Jewish people was one of the biggest massacres in the world's history, known as the Holocaust, where it is estimated that around 6 million Jews were killed.

Learn more about holocaust here: brainly.com/question/12962

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
[06.05 MC]Read the selection and answer the question that follows:
RUDIKE [14]

The Section 2 of Andrew Jackson's inaugural address best proves that he supported the rights of state governments.

<h3>What was the Andrew Jackson's inaugural address?</h3>

After being elected as the President in 1829, he took the oath of office on the East Portico of the U.S. Capitol. In his inaugural address, he promised to respect the rights of states and the constitutional limits on the presidency.

The quoted "As long as our Government is administered for the good of the people, and is regulated by their will; as long as it secures to us the rights of person and of property, liberty of conscience and of the press, it will be worth defending" emphasizes the support he had for the rights of state governments.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about inaugural address

brainly.com/question/9871605

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Which is an issue that is debated by modern-day sociologists?
o-na [289]

Answer:

C. The appropriate balance between observing social injustice and seeking social justice.

Explanation:

This issue is strongly debated by modern-day sociologists, because our social order seems to be innately unjust. There are people who start from worse premises than others, there are people who earn less than others and people who will earn more and there is no society without inequality.

<em>This inequality is considered "social injustice" by modern-day sociologists and philosophers, whereas other voices claim that this kind of "injustice" is not something which can be corrected. </em>

<em>The main idea is that there will always be inequalities in any given society. </em>However, <u>the big question is how big these inequalities should be and how much state interference should there be to diminish these inequalities? </u>Moreover, even with state interference, could inequalities ever be wiped out?

This is what modern-day sociologists are trying to answer, in order to build better societies without imposing too many things on individuals who are faring better than others just by birth.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The supreme court's ability to interest the constitution is called what?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did president johnson commit more troops to fight on the ground in vietnam?
    7·1 answer
  • An Executive order is defined as ___________________.
    15·1 answer
  • 60 points!!!
    8·2 answers
  • What did William loyd garrison write
    12·1 answer
  • How will you warn the town that they need to evacuate?
    15·2 answers
  • What are some ways in which people question and challenge long-<br> standing accepted beliefs today?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Soviets view the Marshall plan (American aid in Europe)
    11·1 answer
  • Why was imperialism occurring in the late 19th century?
    11·1 answer
  • Why do you think that the apartheid government banned the SACP?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!