Answer:
The signs reference the role of the government in protecting the natural rights of the people.
Explanation:
Taking into consideration the signs that the protesters carry, their demands seem to be regarding the safety and security of the rights of not only the people but also that of the whole planet, including the planets and animals. The reference to "Life, Liberty, and Property" in their protest also suggest their intention of demanding for the protection of the whole planet including Mother Earth.
And so, with these signs, the protesters utilizes the Declaration of Independence in emphasizing their demands of the natural rights of the people. The demand that the people have the right to have a livable planet and be safe is an undeniable right. that With the Declaration a part of their reference, they are alluding to the role of the government in ensuring the protection of the people's natural rights.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
Answer:
3 basic rights.
1.Religious freedom
2. Freedom of speach
3. Freedom of the press
Explanation:
All of our rights even inalianable rights come with limits.
The only right that has no limits is the freedom of thought which is the same as religious freedom. You have the right to think and believe anything. But even that has restrictions on how you can act on your beliefs. Your religious beliefs are not a license to do anything related to that belief. You can't engage in human sacrifice as a ritual for the belief. You can't hide behind your religous beliefs as a sheild against prosecution for murder.
"Freedom of religion embraces two concepts, -freedom to believe and freedom to act. The first is absolute, but in the nature of things the second cannot be. ~ <em>Cantwell v Connecticut.</em>
<em />
The freedom of speach also has limits. You can say anything but you can't yell fire in a crowded theater. Doing so could cause a stampede and endanger the lives of others. Likewise, we have an impeachment case before the Senate right now in which the former president incited a riot at the Capital complex that caused the death of 6 people. The question before the Senate is did the former President incite a riot causing death and destruction of public property?
The freedom of the press is a first amendment right. But that doesn't give a publisher the right to slander or print falsehood about another person. The freedom of assembly is another 1st amendment right, but there is a difference between a lawful and peaceful assembly and a riot that results in the death of 5 people and the destruction of property.
Answer:
He was ready to give the people the new leadership they wanted.
Explanation:
People should not pay taxes if they disagree with how the government is spending their money but in doing so it breaks the social contract described by many thinkers during the period of Enlightenment. In the case of wishing to not pay taxes, no government services should be available to the person, nor should they be able to function within the society where others are paying taxes. If one wishes to live their own life not paying taxes and not hurting anyway, there is no ethical or moral reason for them not to do such. However it is important to understand there is no middle ground, not paying taxes and still benefitting from a society.
