Answer:
The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is false.
Explanation:
Contributory negligence is a doctrine of common law that if a person was injured in part due to his/her own negligence, that is his/her negligence contributed to the accident, the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages (money) from another party who supposedly caused the accident.
And historically, contributory negligence was the rule in all states, leading to harsh results. Many states now developed and adopted comparative negligence laws. Today, the jurisdictions that still use contributory negligence are few.
When it comes to international terrorism, there is a lot more that goes into it than crime detection, apprehension, and punishment so this is <u>FALSE</u>.
<h3>What are organized responses to international terrorism?
</h3>
International terrorism is quite complicated and requires more processes to be resolved than crime detection, apprehension, and punishment.
Sometimes it isn't possible to detect the crimes early enough and even when you do, there are political barriers to apprehension.
In conclusion, this is false.
Find out more on terrorism at brainly.com/question/1490223.
Still, low turnouts can lead to unequal representation among various parts of the population. In developed countries, non-voters tend to be concentrated in particular demographic and socioeconomic groups, especially the young and the poor.
Good public policy it makes people
