1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kicyunya [14]
3 years ago
13

The press is free to say whatever they want about whomever they want, regardless of whether they know it’s true.

Law
2 answers:
Nutka1998 [239]3 years ago
7 0

False. The press is not free to say anything about whomever they want regardless of whether it is true or not.

<h3>Freedom of Press according to the United States Consitution</h3>

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution legally protects the rights of the press to say what they want. This freedom, however, is limited and subject to some restrictions. Examples of such restrictions are:

  • If the information removes protection for the whistleblower
  • laws relating to defamation of character
  • prior restraint
  • obscenity
  • fraud
  • speech integral to illegal conduct
  • speech that incites lawless action
  • speech that violates intellectual property law etc.

See the link below for more about Freedom of Speech:

brainly.com/question/11558451

uysha [10]3 years ago
6 0

The answer to the question on whether the press is free to say whatever they want about whomever they want, regardless of whether they know it’s true is:

  • False

<h3>Free Press</h3>

This refers to the freedom of the press in their pursuit of truth and journalism to give to the people.

With this in mind, we can see that the press cannot say false things about someone as that would be considered libel and slander.

Read more about free press here:
brainly.com/question/1344669

You might be interested in
When gathering information about certain occupations, be sure to understand how you are paid. What is the difference between a s
defon

Answer:

The main difference between a salary and an hourly wage is that when someone is being paid monthly it means that their salary is fixed, meaning that the amount of money they get at the end of the month is not prone to changes. On the other hand, we have a wage earner who is paid by the hour of a specific work they do. It means that if they work 40 hours per week, they will get a certain amount of money but if they work an hour or two longer, they have the right to recieve that extra pay.

4 0
3 years ago
The constitutional principle of checks and balances is exemplified by
Jet001 [13]

Answer: BY THE THREE ARMS OF GOVERNMENT (THE EXECUTIVE,THE LEGISLATURE AND THE JUDICIARY)

Explanation:The three arms of Government are an example of the constitutional principle of checks and balance.

Check and balance is the concept enshrined in the a Democratic Constitution where each of the arms of Government act as a watch for the other arm.

The legislature checkmates the activities of The Executive to prevent abuse of Power they can summon the Executive arm if they discovered any anomally.

The Judiciary have the powers to interpret laws to bring about fairness and justice for both the Executive and legislative arms.

The Executive through the president has the power not to sign bills passed by the legislature if it is not in line with existing laws.etc

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Phil joins Sky-High Designs as a designer. He signs an employment agreement that says he will not engage in design work in the c
Crank

Answer:  

lose because employee contracts that restrict trade are illegal        

Explanation:

The above case relates to the restraint of trade. Export limitations are a concept in customary law referring to the constitutionality in commercial limits on the right to do commerce. This is a forerunner to the current rule to competition.

A statutory commitment not to exchange is null and unenforceable towards the Promiser as opposed to the national policy of encouraging commerce, although the restriction of exchange is fair to preserve the rights of a trade buyer. Trade restrictions may also manifest as binding covenants in work arrangements throughout post-termination.

3 0
3 years ago
How does the Fourteenth Amendment define a U.S. citizen?
drek231 [11]

Answer:

Citizenship is defined in the first clause of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment as: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.

3 0
3 years ago
Help me answer all of these , i’ll give brainlist !
Mrac [35]

Answer:

1.implied

2.expressed

3.expressed

4.expressed

5.implied

6.implied

7.implied

8.expressed

9.expressed

10. implied

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does securing the crime scene involve?
    5·1 answer
  • By age 2, children __________. Select one: a. take turns in face-to-face interaction b. can infer a speaker's indirectly express
    10·1 answer
  • Why is it difficult for a bill to become a law?
    11·1 answer
  • In what way did larger states feel they were disadvantaged by the articles of confederation leading them to push for the constit
    9·1 answer
  • :-<br>sludy<br>Identify the<br>picture and few <br><br>lines on it.<br>few lines​
    7·1 answer
  • the sum of the ages of farhan and his cousin is 38. Seven years ago, Farhan was thrice as old as his cousin. Find farhan’s prese
    13·1 answer
  • Allows an appointed attorney-in-fact to make decisions about the grantor's medical care
    15·1 answer
  • Workplace murders are most commonly committed by offenders in which age group? O a . Under 18 O b . 18-24 O c . 25-34 O d 35-49
    8·1 answer
  • Common law is never as easy as we may like because the law is trying to accommodate both a. understandability and predictability
    7·1 answer
  • What is domestic law.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!