1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kicyunya [14]
3 years ago
13

The press is free to say whatever they want about whomever they want, regardless of whether they know it’s true.

Law
2 answers:
Nutka1998 [239]3 years ago
7 0

False. The press is not free to say anything about whomever they want regardless of whether it is true or not.

<h3>Freedom of Press according to the United States Consitution</h3>

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution legally protects the rights of the press to say what they want. This freedom, however, is limited and subject to some restrictions. Examples of such restrictions are:

  • If the information removes protection for the whistleblower
  • laws relating to defamation of character
  • prior restraint
  • obscenity
  • fraud
  • speech integral to illegal conduct
  • speech that incites lawless action
  • speech that violates intellectual property law etc.

See the link below for more about Freedom of Speech:

brainly.com/question/11558451

uysha [10]3 years ago
6 0

The answer to the question on whether the press is free to say whatever they want about whomever they want, regardless of whether they know it’s true is:

  • False

<h3>Free Press</h3>

This refers to the freedom of the press in their pursuit of truth and journalism to give to the people.

With this in mind, we can see that the press cannot say false things about someone as that would be considered libel and slander.

Read more about free press here:
brainly.com/question/1344669

You might be interested in
In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni
german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0
4 years ago
The United States Postal Inspection Service was created to prevent _____. A. people from sending mail without proper postage B.
Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

B. the national mail system from being used for criminal or illegal purposes.

Explanation:

The United States Postal Inspection Service is a federal law enforcement sector of the posting service that inspects and makes sure that the mail system is used in a fair and safe manner. This process safeguards the general public from any harm and also ensures the mail system from any illegal or dangerous activity.

Thus, the <u>correct answer is that the US Postal Inspection Service was created so that the national mail system will not be used for any criminal or illegal purposes and also to safeguard people from any harm.</u>

3 0
3 years ago
Which would MOST LIKELY be an example of topic covered by an amendment in a state constitution? A) changing high school graduati
mezya [45]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The state controls what a school is required to do in order to pass its students. The other 3 options are a matter of the federal govt aka it being national issues, which means the state govts have no control over those issues or topics

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When the united states’ use of military force is successful in maintaining national security, it means to say that the ________
Korvikt [17]

Answer: It means the United States has determined towards improving how to take over all states or countries

Explanation:

When the united states' use of military force is successful in maintaining national security, the United States : It means the United States has determined towards improving how to take over all states or countries by Occupying them.

The military force did this purposely to prevent any occurrence of threat, war or destruction in the nearest future. After the national security has been duly maintained, fixing of the problems shall follow suit in a peaceful way.

8 0
3 years ago
HELLO? PLEASE HELP
zhenek [66]

Answer: they guarantee the rights of individuals

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In your opinion, does the government work the way it should? Is power shared equally or does one branch control more than its sh
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a new technology that makes correctional<br> institutions safer?
    7·1 answer
  • 23. If a licensee fails to renew his/her license within_months of expiration, the licensee will be
    11·1 answer
  • Explain what role the present day mass media can have on both the public and on the government
    14·2 answers
  • Which document prohibited Americans from fighting in the war between Great Britain and France?
    14·1 answer
  • The Four S's in the vehicle movement checklist are?
    5·1 answer
  • Which cabinet position deals with the weather?
    10·1 answer
  • Explain what the power to regulate interstate commerce means?.
    14·1 answer
  • Why did rosa parks refuse to give her seat up
    7·1 answer
  • What is it called when a country uses changes to taxes and spending to influence the macroeconomy?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!