1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Goryan [66]
3 years ago
7

Nanke Products, Inc., has a Sensor Division that manufactures and sells a number of products, including a standard sensor that c

ould be used by another division in the company, the Safety Products Division, in one of its products. Data concerning that sensor appear below:
Capacity in units 58,000
Selling price to outside customers $64
Variable cost per unit $20
Fixed cost per unit (based on capacity) $17

The Safety Products Division is currently purchasing 3,000 of these sensors per year from an overseas supplier at a cost of $59 per sensor. Assume that the Sensor Division is selling all of the sensors it can produce to outside customers. What should be the minimum acceptable transfer price for the sensors from the standpoint of the Sensor Division?
Business
1 answer:
Alexandra [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

$64

Explanation:

The minimum acceptable transfer price for the sensors from the standpoint of the Sensor Division is a price that would be the best for the performance evaluation of the <u>Sensor Division Manager </u>and also <u>best for the company</u>.

If the division is transferring items to another division the goals remain the same and the price is calculated as :

Minimum acceptable transfer price = variable costs - internal savings + opportunity cost

Therefore,

Minimum acceptable transfer price =  $20 + ( $64 - $20)

                                                            = $64

Therefore, the minimum acceptable transfer price for the sensors from the standpoint of the Sensor Division is $64 assuming that there is an opportunity cost of $44 that is ($64 - $20).

You might be interested in
To pay for your​ education, you've taken out ​$29,000 in student loans. If you make monthly payments over 10 years at 7 percent
Scrat [10]

Answer:

$169.07

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Loan amount = $29,000

Time  = 10 years

Interest rate = 7% compounded monthly

Therefore,

Interest rate per period, r = 7% ÷ 12 = 0.583% = 0.00583

number of periods, n = 10 × 12 = 120 months

Now,

Loan amount = Monthly payments × [ { 1 - (1 + r )⁻ⁿ } ÷ r]

on substituting the respective values, we get

$29,000 = Monthly payments × [ { 1 - (1 + 0.00583 )⁻¹²⁰ } ÷ 0.00583]

or

$29,000 = Monthly payments × 171.53

or

Monthly payments = $169.07

7 0
3 years ago
pdf Suppose that the pound is pegged to gold at £20 per ounce and the dollar is pegged to gold at $35 per ounce. This implies an
Tasya [4]

Answer:

1) Buy 10 ounces of gold with the 350 dollars

2) Sell the 10 ounces of gold for £200

3) Exchange £200 for 360 dollars

Explanation:

Due to the difference between the exchange rate in gold and currency, a 2.1%  (1.80 / 1.75) advantage can be obtained.  

You start in the gold market with 350 dollars which are equal to 10 ounces of gold which are equal to £200. This according to the gold prices, witch generate a 1.75 exchange rate.

Then you go to the financial market where the exchange rate is larger (1.80) and with the £200 you get 360 dollars.  

6 0
3 years ago
​Colgate-Palmolive Company has just paid an annual dividend of $ 1.09. Analysts are predicting dividends to grow by $ 0.19 per y
sveta [45]

Answer:

$74.62

Explanation:

Div₀ = $1.09

expected growth $0.19 per year

Div₁ = $1.28

Div₂ = $1.47

Div₃ = $1.66

Div₄ = $1.85

Div₅ = $2.04

then constant growth rte of 5.3%

equity cost = 7.5%

first we need to determine the stock price in year 5 using the Gordon growth model:

stock price = [dividend x (1+g)] / (Re - g) = ($2.04 x 1.053) / (7.5% - 5.3%) = $97.64

now we can discount all the future cash flows:

stock price = $1.28/1.075 + $1.47/1.075² + $1.66/1.075³ + $1.85/1.075⁴ + $2.04/1.075⁵ + $97.64/1.075⁵ = $1.19 + $1.27 + $1.34 + $1.39 + $1.42 + $68.01 = $74.62

8 0
3 years ago
If the long-run average total cost curve for a firm is horizontal in a relevant range of production, then it indicates that ther
sweet-ann [11.9K]

If the long-run average total cost curve for a firm is horizontal in a relevant range of production, then it indicates that there (B) are constant returns to scale.

<h3>What is the long-run average total cost curve?</h3>
  • The long-run average cost (LRAC) curve depicts the firm's lowest cost per unit at each output level, assuming that all production parameters are changeable.
  • The LRAC curve presupposes that the firm has determined the best factor mix for creating any amount of production, as discussed in the previous section.
  • To derive the long-run total cost function, we take the expansion path's total cost and quantity pairs.
  • "When all factors of production are variable, the long-run total cost function displays the lowest total cost of generating each amount."
  • If a firm's long-run average total cost curve is horizontal in a relevant production range, it shows that there are consistent returns to scale.

As the description states, if a firm's long-run average total cost curve is horizontal in a relevant production range, it shows that there are consistent returns to scale.

Therefore, if the long-run average total cost curve for a firm is horizontal in a relevant range of production, then it indicates that there (B) are constant returns to scale.

Know more about the long-run average total cost curve here:

brainly.com/question/10205972

#SPJ4

Complete question:

If the long-run average total cost curve for a firm is horizontal in a relevant range of production, then it indicates that there

A. isn't a minimum efficiency scale.

B. are constant returns to scale.

C. are diseconomies of scale.

D. are economies of scale.

5 0
2 years ago
7. Which of the following is NOT a function of money * 3 points A Unit of account B Store of value C Protection against inflatio
Nuetrik [128]

Answer:

C Protection against inflation

Explanation:

As we know that there are three functions of money i.e.

1. Unit of account

2. Store of value

3. Medium of exchange

There is only 3 functions of money that are shown above

So the protection against inflation would not be considered for the same

And, these 3 would represent the functions of money and can be treated as the unit of account, store of value and the medium of exchange

Hence, the option c is correct

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When lisa and loretta santiago ran away from home a second time, frank haines made temporary arrangements for them to receive ca
    11·1 answer
  • At the beginning of the year an investor purchased 100 shares of common stock from ABC Corporation at $10 per share. During the
    12·1 answer
  • In 3-5 sentences, what aspects of economic growth may not be reflected in the GDP of a country?
    14·1 answer
  • g"Which of the following statements is true about minimum wage laws? Select Answer A. Minimum wage laws are a successful tool to
    10·1 answer
  • Kyle Parker of Concord, New Hampshire, has been shopping for a new car for several weeks. He has negotiated a price of $38,000 o
    11·1 answer
  • Net working capital is defined as: a. current liabilities minus shareholders' equity. b. total liabilities minus shareholders' e
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the meaning and importance of advertising
    13·2 answers
  • Because she didn't have a piece of paper handy, mary mentally repeated the long-distance phone number over and over. mary was tr
    8·1 answer
  • while canoeing ont he tickfaw river, shannon traveled 30 miles upstream against the current in 5 hr. It took her only 3 hr paddl
    5·1 answer
  • How did the government help the economy? the economy of country y has experienced increased unemployment and reduced gdp for six
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!