Answer:
b. 300,000 shares being sold is an issuer transaction and the 200,000 shares being sold is a non-issuer transaction.
Explanation:
A non-issuer transaction is a transaction that does not directly benefit an issuer or it was not directly executed to benefit an issuer.
According to the Uniform State Law, an entity involved in the sales of certificates of interest, leases, mining titles among others is officially exempted from being labelled as an issuer. Hence, the entity (officers of the firm) in the question are non-issuer brokers.
Specifically, when the sales of stock are carried out by someone or an individual who is not a registered stockbroker, that individual officially becomes what is called 'a non-issuer broker-dealer'. The implication is that such a transaction is to be exempted from the registration requirements of the Security Exchange Commission.
In this question, since the issuer newly issued 300,000 shares while the remaining 200,000 in the proposed combination was offered by Officers of the firm - non-issuer broker-dealers. The Law states that it must be separated to show that 300,000 shares are sold in an issuer transaction (Primary) directly involving an official issuer while 200,000 shares are sold in a non-issuer transaction (Secondary).
Answer:
Explanation:
Using dividend growth model formula for finding dividend per year can be used to find the growth rate per year;
The formula would be D1 = D0(1+g)
and D2 = D1(1+g)
D3 = D2 (1+g) and so on....
Starting with 2.00 dividend, <u>growth rate from yr1-yr2;</u>
2.07 = 2.00*(1+g)
Divide both sides by 2.00;
1+g = 2.07/ 2.00
1+g = 1.035
g = 1.035-1
g ( y1-y2) = 0.035 or 3.5%
<u>Growth rate from yr2-yr3;</u>
2.24 = 2.07(1+g)
Divide both sides by 2.07;
2.24/2.07 = 1+g
1.0821 = 1+g
1.0821-1 = g
g= 0.0821 or 8.21%
Therefore, g(y2-y3) = 8.21%
<u>Growth rate from yr3-yr4;</u>
2.34 = 2.24(1+g)
Divide both sides by 2.24;
2.34/2.24 = 1+g
1.0446 = 1+g
1.0446 -1 =g
g =0.0446 or 4.46%
Therefore, g(y3-y4) = 4.46%
<u>Growth rate from yr4-yr5;</u>
2.50 = 2.34(1+g)
2.50/2.34 = 1+g
1.0684 = 1+g
1.0684-1 = g
g=0.0684 or 6.84%
Therefore, g(y4-y5) = 6.84%
Answer:
15.20%
Explanation:
The computation of the M1 increase is shown below:
= (M1 End of the year 2011 - M1 end of the year 2010) ÷ M1 End of the year 2010
= ($2,311 billion - $2,006 billion) ÷ ($2,006 billion)
= 15.20%
Answer:
B. I, II, and IV only
Explanation:
Job specialization can be defined as a strategic process which typically involves the ability of employees working in an organization to develop specific skills, knowledge, great expertise or professionalism and experience to perform their duties, tasks or job functions effectively and efficiently.
In order to gain the requisite skills, expertise and knowledge for job specialization, it is very important for the employees to have undergone an extensive training and a good number of years in work experience.
The primary purpose of job specialization is to increase efficiency and productivity because the employees are able to specialize in the use of specific tools (equipments) to accomplish their tasks, as well as limit the level of error or mistakes in the production process.
In Business management, method analysis can be defined as the study of the detailed process for the performance of a job i.e how a job is done. Thus, method analysis gives a detailed report on the tasks involved in the performance of a job and how they are to be done.
Basically, methods analysis is particularly valuable when it is used on jobs that:
1. Are high in labor content.
2. Are done frequently.
3. Are unsafe, tiring, unpleasant, and/or noisy.
Answer:
Answer is a i.e. 0.
Explanation:
No net loss is allowed for personal/rental properties.