Answer:
March 1, purchased securities from Benton Corporation:
Dr Investment in securities 500,000
Cr Cash 500,000
May 1, sold half of securities plus accrued interest:
Dr Cash 248,550
Dr Loss on investment in securities 5,000
Dr Brokerage fees 200
Cr Investment in securities 250,000
Cr Interest revenue 3,750
Securities were sold at 98 or $250,000 x 98% = $245,000, which means that the company lost $5,000 with that investment.
True rather be safe then sorry
Answer:The analysis must be incorrect because the total score should sum up to 1
Explanation: Analytical Hierarchy process is a mathematical model used in determining the viability of a process from sets of process using set criterion ,these criteria are selected such that it determine the like hood of success of the project,the number written above represent the weight of each of the process ,the overall weight of the criterion is always when summed up.
The weight represents the likelihood of the events happening or being successful.
Answer: False
Explanation:
A sudden stop refers to the sudden decline in net capital inflows in the economy from outside. This is a significant method by which the economy can have access to foreign exchange.
If the country therefore borrows internationally in foreign currencies whilst lending in domestic currency, the sudden stop will be difficult to navigate because it will impair the country's ability to pay off the international creditors it has because it will not have enough of the required foreign currency to pay them.
Answer:
The fraud was discovered Option D: The operations manager found a check made payable to Phillips while searching Phillips' desk for some accounting records.
Explanation:
In the given case study, Ernie Phillips had got a job as a 'controller'. He had started writing checks to himself other than the payroll checks.
This fraud can be discovered when the operations manager found a check on Phillips desk which was payable to himself and it was other than the payroll check. Thus, Option D is the statement as an answer.
Cancelled checks do not have to do anything with the fraud, as per Option A, because cancelled checks are never cleared in the bank. The receiver doesn't usually receive a call before check clearance. So, Option B is also incorrect. No error was there in the check as stated in Option C.
