Answer: <em>$4. 71 hamburger and $6.29 French fries.
</em>
Explanation:
Total spendable income of Antonio = $11.00
1 hamburger = $1.50
1 order of French fries = $1.00
Utility maximization function: U(x1, x2) = x1x2 i.e. 1 hamburger and 2 orders of French fries
Using the Utility maximization function: U(x1, x2) = $1.50 + $2.00
= $3.50 per lunch
Therefore the customer will purchase hamburger worth of $(1.50 x 11.00/3.50) = $4. 71
And French fries orders worth of $(2.00 x 11.00/3.50) = $6.29
<em>Antonio will maximize his satisfaction by purchasing $4. 71 hamburger and $6.29 French fries.
</em>
Answer:
The answer is option B) According to the Lewis two-sector model the creation of a Modern (urban) Sector will:
Create a flow of labor from the traditional sector into the modern sector.
Explanation:
The two sector model propounded by W. Arthur Lewis is a theory of development that identifies two sectors: the traditional and modern sector.
According to this theory, the creation of a modern sector will generate a flow of excess labor from the traditional sector to the urban sector where there is more demand for labor.
Over time, this migration will create more jobs, stimulate industrialization and a framework for sustainable development.
For every jar Neha buys, she spends $0.95, and buying 9 jars in total, she pays $8.55 in total.
$0.95 x 9 jars = $8.55
For every jar Neha buys, she spends $0.95, and buying 9 jars in total, she pays $8.55 in total.
Learn more about cost here brainly.com/question/14358130
#SPJ1.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Assumption of the risk.
Explanation:
If the risk inherent in a particular action that caused an injury is knowingly and voluntarily assumed, you cannot sue anyone to recover the damages. Suppose, for example, a situation in which he went to a friend's house and was warned about the use of the back door because the floor cover was seriously damaged and would not support a person's weight on it. If you have decided to ignore the warning and use the back door, the doctrine of risk taking will probably prevent the recovery of injuries sustained by a fall on that floor. The court will decide that you "assumed the risk" of such injury.
8% effective. at the end of 10 years, the total of the two funds is 52,000. at the end of 8 years, the amount in fund b is three times that in fund