Answer: d
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
B. h=2A/(b1+b2) . . . . parentheses are needed
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply the equation by the inverse of the coefficient of h. That coefficient is (b1 +b2)/2, so its inverse is 2/(b1 +b2). Parentheses are needed.
... 2A/(b1 +b2) = h
_____
<em>Comment on the answer choices</em>
As written, <em>none of them are correct</em>. The denominator can only be written without parentheses if the division bar is horizontal, and so serves also as a grouping symbol.
Answer:
(3•22g4h5)
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: ((3gh2 • 4) • g3) • h3
Step 2: ((3•22gh2) • g3) • h3
Step 3: 3.1 h2 multiplied by h3 = h(2 + 3) = h5
Final answer: (3•22g4h5)
(IF THIS HELPED PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST OR RATE IT 5 STARS!)
Answer:
you have to set each factor to 0 and solve.
Step-by-step explanation:
<span>1. Suppose that a family has an equally likely chance of having a cat or a dog. If they have two pets, they could have 1 dog and 1 cat, they could have 2 dogs, or they could have 2 cats.
What is the theoretical probability that the family has two dogs or two cats?
25% chance
</span><span>2. Describe how to use two coins to simulate which two pets the family has.
</span>
You could use the coins to simulate which pet the family has by flipping them and having head be dog and tails be cat (or vice-versa).
<span>3. Flip both coins 50 times and record your data in a table like the one below.
</span><span>Based on your data, what is the experimental probability that the family has two dogs or two cats?
</span>
Based on the results, I concluded that for Heads, Heads (which could be dogs or cats) there was a 24% chance and for Tails, Tails there was a 26% chance
<span>4. If the family has three pets, what is the theoretical probability that they have three dogs or three cats?
1/8 chance (accidentally messed up there) or 12.5%
</span><span>5. How could you change the simulation to generate data for three pets?
</span><span>
To flip 3 coins and add more spots on the chart.
I hope that this helps because it took a while to write out. If it does, please rate as Brainliest
</span>
