Answer:
Explanation:
Run A Duration B Duration C Duration 1 51 48 17 2 60 48 19 3 30 39 19 4 31 48 22 5 30 31 14 6 41 16 17 7 44 12 6 8 44 12 10 9 45 43 9 10 60 41 10 Based on the simulated numbers given above, what is the average completion time of the whole project?
Since B is the predecessor of C.
Project completion time for each run will be calculated as Maximum (Duration of A, Duration of B +Duration of C).
Represent
Run = R
Duration of A = DA
Duration of B = DB
Duration of C = DC
Project Completion time = PT
<u>R DA DB DC PT</u>
1 51 48 17 48 + 17 = 65
2 60 48 19 48 + 19 = 67
4 31 48 22 48 + 22 = 70
5 30 31 14 31 + 14 = 45
6 41 16 17 41
7 44 12 6 44
8 44 12 10 44
9 45 43 9 43 + 9 = 52
10 60 41 10 60
<u> Total = 546</u>
Total Project completion time in 10 Stimulations = 546
Average project Completion time = 546/10 = 54.6
Therefore, average Project completion time is between 53 and 56 days.
Answer:
I think it's A) Always just answer the question the customer has.
Explanation:
I know it's not D) "Never look the customer in the eye."
I don't think it's C) "Always answer a question with another question" that just seems like it would be confusing for the customer.
And I don't think it's B) "Never try to get more information about what the customer needs" because part of you're job as a salesman is find out what the customer needs.
So that leaves answer choice A
Answer:
30 in total
Explanation:
In order to calculate how many items A we can produce we need to check how many units required we have, in this case, we have:
40 B's
50 C's
15 D's
We require 2 units of C, 1 Unit of B, and 1 unit of C.
As you can see in our inventory we only have 15 units of D's, meaning that that is our maximum number of items A produced this week, since we already have 15 A items, we can deliver 30 A products this week.
Answer:
Gathering publicly available comparable company information
Creating detailed forecasts for both companies
An accretion/dilution and sensitivity analysis
Determining and calculating items related to the acquisition structure
Answer: Yes they did.
Explanation:
Apparent Authority refers to a scenario where a Agent is assumed to have the power to act on behalf of a Principal regardless of if said authority had not being expressly given whether implicitly or otherwise.
It is worthy of note that this power is only valid if the third party in the transaction assumes from the conduct of the agent, that they have such powers to act.
It is stated in the text that there was no question that the brokers had the actual or implied authority to sell the stock meaning that the Principal had not done enough to show that the agents did not have the Authority to act as they did. For this reason, they can indeed be sued under the Principle of Apparent Authority.
