Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We can solve this in either of two approaches: Mathematically or Graphically.
<u>Mathematically</u>
y=-(3/4)(x-4)^2+12 where y is the height of the ball, and x is the time, in seconds.
We want to know how many seconds for the height to be 0, so y=0.
0 = -(3/4)(x-4)^2+12
-12 = -(3/4)(x-4)^2
12*(4/3) = (x-4)^2
16 = (x-4)^2
x = 8 and 0 (the initial point).]
It will reach the ground in 8 seconds
<u>Graphically</u>
Plot the function and find the time, x, when the graph passes through the x axis (after t = 0). Attached.
60 is 83% of 72.
60 divided by 12 is 5, and 72 divided by 12 is six.
5/6 equals 0.83
0.83 x 100 is 83, or 83%.
<span>Brainiest would be nice.</span>
Answer:
<u>B. There is sufficient evidence that the mean of the pressure required to open a certain valve has changed. </u>
Step-by-step explanation:
We make this conclusion based on these reasons:
- We are told that the "null hypothesis was rejected" after the <em>"manager feels that the pressure variability has changed.,</em> meaning the <u>null hypothesis was the opposite of what occurred; that is to say, it is the alternate hypothesis that proved true instead.</u>
- <em>"changes in the manufacturing process"</em> form what can be called "sufficient evidence" that the mean of the pressure required to open the valve has changed, thereby going against the null hypothesis.
It is based on the above reasons that the null hypothesis was rejected.
