Answer:
Both the editorial and the biography support the author’s purpose of drawing attention to the plight of refugees. The two pieces work to create emotions in the reader and empathy for Enrique and other young migrants from Central America. However, the author uses different approaches in each text. The editorial includes words with strong connotations to persuade readers. In this text, the author works to convince readers the United States should change its refugee policy. On the other hand, the biography relies on narrative techniques and figurative language. The author uses setting, characterization, and personification to educate readers on the topic.
<span>Ice floats because ice is less dense (lighter) that water, especially the denser oceanic waters. Though ice floats, most of the ice cube, ice berg, etc, remains beneath the surface with only a portion showing above the surface.</span>
The poet sees something in nature that cannot be evaluated.
Answer:
I went down to the shop today and I needed to by something form the supermarket when I picked up, what I needed and went to pay. The lady who worked there was very generous and helped me take it home, but on the way home I just claps and my legs just went I couldn't stand up or even move, 'am I paralysed' I said. the lady said 'no, but we do need to take you to the hospital I will take you to my car that is just around the corner' as we drove down I felt cold and as if my soul was leaving my body but I hanged on for dear life it was something bout that woman that I couldn't put my finger on. i said to her 'you don't have to stay you have a job you don't have to stay with and old lady like me.' she held my hand as I went she started crying but you my have just known if you stay with some one even for five minutes you will get to know the person who there really are.
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Two experiments demonstrate the powerful influence of others’ views on individual attitudes and attitude expression. Those around us can influence our views through persuasion and information exchange, but the current research hypothesizes that exposure to alternate views even without discussion or exchange of persuasive arguments can also alter what attitudes are expressed, and even generate long term shifts in attitudes. In an initial study, naïve participants were asked their attitudes on a range of standard survey items privately, publicly in a group with trained confederates, and again privately following the group setting. Findings indicate significant attitudinal conformity, which was most pronounced when participants were faced with a unanimous (versus non-unanimous) group. The group experience continued to influence participants’ views when they were again asked their views in private. A second experiment varied whether participants heard views from live confederates or via computer, demonstrating that these effects could not be attributed only to issue-relevant information provided by or inferred from group members, and that attitude change persisted long after participants had left the laboratory. In summary, when people are asked their attitudes publicly, they adjust their responses to conform to those around them, and this attitude change persists privately, even weeks later. Accordingly, such purely social processes of attitude change may be every bit as important as more traditional cognitive informational processes in understanding where people’s political attitudes come from, and how they may be changed.