Answer:
$4,000
Explanation:
The difference between the face value of note and the issuance value of the note is discount. This discount is recorded and amortized over the note life to maturity. As the note is for 6 months and There are also six months from June 30, to December 31. So, all the Discount of $4,000 ($50,000-$46,000) will be recognized as Interest Income. This discount can be amortized and recognized as Interest Income on monthly basis or collectively at the year end.
Questions from potential investors will be related to the functionality of the business plan presented. These questions have to be answered in a professional manner in the sense that the presenter has to be friendly and accommodating in his attitude. He should make eye contacts with the questioners. Each question should be answered with the goal of making the questioner understand the question that is bothering him or her. Answers should be given in a formal and explanatory tone that suggest that the presenter knows what he is talking about.
Answer: Bonus pay plan of individual-level performance-based pay
Explanation:
In this scenario, an extrinsic reward used here is the bonus pay plan. An extrinsic reward simply means a reward that is being given to the employee of a particular company after a particular thing has been achieved.
Here, a bonus pay plan of individual-level performance-based pay is being used. A bonus is given to the employee for meeting a particular requirements. Bonus are calculated base on either the percentage of ones wages or salaries or by using a flat rate.
Answer:<em> Option (D) is correct </em>
Explanation:
To weaken the conclusion, the answer will emphasize on why Baurisia will not soon become an importer of grain.
Here, in this case if importing meat is cheaper than importing grain, then Baurisia is likely to satisfy the demand for meat by becoming an importer of meat, weakening the conclusion that Baurisia will soon become an importer of grain.
<em>Therefore , It is more economical for Baurisians to import meat than grain, if true, most seriously weakens the argument.</em>
Answer:
dual mandate.
Explanation:
dual mandate -
It is the practice in which the elected officials serves in more than one elected or public position .
In Britain , this term is also referred to as double jobbing .
In some cases , the dual mandate is prohibited by the law , as in the case of the federal states , because the federal office holders are not allowed to hold state office .
Hence from the question information , the correct option is dual mandate .
