This question is incomplete because the passage from the source Miral wants to include is missing; here is the passage:
Read the excerpt from a credible source for Mirai's research-based essay on the effects of the declining bee population.
Honeybees play a major role in the pollination of produce sold in the United States. Without the prolific support of honeybees, the nation's agricultural economy will suffer losses as great as those in the bee population.
The correct answer to this question is C. She should quote the second sentence directly, because it establishes important supporting evidence in a unique way.
Explanation:
In general, you can include credible sources by quoting, paraphrasing, or summarizing this. Additionally, it is recommended to paraphrase or summarize the information if the information is general or can be restated without losing its essence. On the opposite, you should quote if the wording is unique, which means using your own words will affect the essence of the information, and if the piece of evidence directly supports the main argument.
According to this, in the source presented it recommended Mirai quotes the second sentence because this directly supports her main argument about the effects of the decline in the bees population. Also, the wording on it is unique and would be difficult to replace. For example, the expression "the nation's agricultural economy will suffer losses as great as those in the bee population" would lose its argumentative strength unique style if it is paraphrased or summarized.
Answer:
A.) It symbolizes that Ozymandias's kingdom has crumbled with time.
Explanation:
"Ozymandias" is a poem written by<em> Percy Shelley</em>, an English romantic poet. She started writing it in 1817. It is said that she was inspired by the statue of Rameses II<em> (in fragments)</em> that the British museum acquired.
The poem clearly shows that there was once a powerful race in Egypt, but <em>has been forgotten with time</em>. The stone talked about Ozymandias being the "King of Kings" and how glorious his city was. However, <em>it has already crumbled with time</em> because it is no longer there.<em> </em>There were only a few evidence of it, such as the fragments found.
I think you missed something in your question here
Answer:Ethos, Pathos, Logos work together. They are effective only if the audience finds them persuasive. If the speaker/writer can convince the audience that he or she is credible, then ethos is persuasive. If the speaker/writer can incite emotion in the audience, then pathos is persuasive.
Explanation:
Have a great Day!
