Explanation:
U.S. foreign policy toward Latin America in the 19th century initially focused on excluding or limiting the military and economic influence of European powers, territorial expansion, and encouraging American commerce. These objectives were expressed in the No Transfer Principle (1811) and the Monroe Doctrine (1823). American policy was unilateralist (not isolationist); it gradually became more aggressive and interventionist as the idea of Manifest Destiny contributed to wars and military conflicts against indigenous peoples, France, Britain, Spain, and Mexico in the Western Hemisphere. Expansionist sentiments and U.S. domestic politics inspired annexationist impulses and filibuster expeditions to Mexico, Cuba, and parts of Central America. Civil war in the United States put a temporary halt to interventionism and imperial dreams in Latin America. From the 1870s until the end of the century, U.S. policy intensified efforts to establish political and military hegemony in the Western Hemisphere, including periodic naval interventions in the Caribbean and Central America, reaching even to Brazil in the 1890s. By the end of the century Secretary of State Richard Olney added the Olney Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine (“Today the United States is practically sovereign on this continent and its fiat is law upon the subjects to which it confines its interposition . . .”), and President Theodore Roosevelt contributed his own corollary in 1904 (“in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of wrongdoing or impotence, to exercise an international police power”). American policy toward Latin America, at the turn of the century, explicitly justified unilateral intervention, military occupation, and transformation of sovereign states into political and economic protectorates in order to defend U.S. economic interests and an expanding concept of national security.
1. C
Cesare Bonesana Beccaria was an Italian philosopher who believed that laws exist to preserve social order, not to avenge crimes. He criticized common abuses of justice such as torturing witnesses and suspects, irregular proceedings and trials, and cruel punishments. Believes that people should receive a speedy trial and torture should never be used. The degree of the punishment should be based on the seriousness of the crime. Did not believe in capital punishment.
2. The correct answer is John Locke (A)
3. D.
Scientific Revolution was the series of events that led to the birth of modern science. It occurred between about 1540 and 1700. Why would the birth of science be called a "revolution"? the answer is that science was a radical new idea. It was a completely different way of looking at the world. Before the Scientific Revolution, most educated people who studied the world took guidance from the explanations given by the authorities like ancient Greek writers and Catholic Church officials.
Answer:
Chris is discovering just how hard it is to live in the Alaskan wilderness. Any romantic precepts of living in a cozy cabin like Thoreau are quickly dispelled. Chris knows he is either going to survive or die. His thoughts become a precious glimpse into Chris headspace as his world becomes less about ideology and more about survival. Chris also discovers what most readers knew from the beginning: Chris needs the company of other people. He begins to see the folly of rejecting his family, especially his sister Carine. Chris becomes a dynamic character a little too late. Krakauer included these sections to get us closer to Chris than we had ever been before. Much of the book is seen through Krakauer's lens of Chris. In these chapters we get a glimpse into Chris from his own words.
Explanation:
Answer:
Chris is discovering just how hard it is to live in the Alaskan wilderness. Any romantic precepts of living in a cozy cabin like Thoreau are quickly dispelled. Chris knows he is either going to survive or die. His thoughts become a precious glimpse into Chris headspace as his world becomes less about ideology and more about survival. Chris also discovers what most readers knew from the beginning: Chris needs the company of other people. He begins to see the folly of rejecting his family, especially his sister Carine. Chris becomes a dynamic character a little too late. Krakauer included these sections to get us closer to Chris than we had ever been before. Much of the book is seen through Krakauer's lens of Chris. In these chapters we get a glimpse into Chris from his own words.