Answer:
The statement is: False.
Explanation:
The dialectic approach is a method of communication that takes place when two individuals have a different point of view over a certain matter but wish to come to an understanding of the other's position by reasoned arguments. The dialectic approach combines the social, interpretive, and critical approaches.
Answer:
<em>Total cost of product using the Activity-Based costing</em>
Particulars Amount
Material cost $10
Labor cost $15
Overheads cost under ABC <u>$16</u>
Total cost of product <u>$41</u>
<span>c. common resources are rival in consumption.
In the tragedy of the commons, William Forster Lloyd presented the example of a common resource being over used and destroyed because for any individual abusing the resource, they gained a benefit while the damage to the resource was paid by everyone.
So let's look at the available options and see what makes sense, or doesn't make sense.
a. people consider the value of resources in the future more than in the present.
* If this were true, the there wouldn't be a tragedy of the commons. So this is an incorrect answer.
b. markets do not account for the presence of property rights.
* The tragedy of the commons doesn't involve property rights. EVERYONE in the community is allowed to use the commons. The problem is irresponsible overuse of the common resource. So this is also an incorrect answer.
c. common resources are rival in consumption.
* This is the correct answer. The concept of Rivalry is where a common resource can not be simultaneous consumed by multiple users, or if the consumption of a resource decreases its utility to another consumer. In the tragedy, if one person grazes (consumes) more than their fair share, the commons gets over grazed and over time stops producing. Each person who's overgrazing does get a tangible short term benefit for doing so, but everyone has to pay the cost.
d. government does not efficiently allocate society's scarce resources.
* This is also a wrong answer. It's true that the commons could be regulated by the government, but then it would no longer be the commons.</span>
Answer:
Relationships; Competition.
Explanation:
In today's business environment, firms that truly focus on customers must instill a corporate culture that places customers and other stakeholders at the top of the organizational hierarchy. when this occurs, the firm shifts its focus from transactions to <u>relationships</u>, and from <u>competitions</u> to collaboration.
Customer are considered to be king in the current open market condition, where seller are trying every bit to attract more and more customer. When a firm possesses capabilities that allow it to serve customers' needs better than the competition, the firm is said to have competitive advantage, however, this lead to shift of focus from transaction to relation building with customer to gain profit in long run and it does not focus only on competition but look for collaboration with customer to gain competitive advantage for future.
Answer:
The answer should be un terms of the traded goods. In the case of the minimum price of rum, it is 0.5 barrels of rum per one ton of coffee. In the case of the maximum price of coffee, it is 6 tons of coffee per barrel of coffee.
Explanation:
These values come from the analysis of opportunity cost that both countries have at the moment of use the production capacity: if the Dominican Republic decides to produce rum, then it would give up on coffee. The same with Nicaragua, when it chooses to produce coffee, it gives up producing rum. The potential trade opportunities arise in the mix of prices where both countries can take benefit form the exchange of goods (obtaining more of one product than producing with its own capacity). This is called comparative advantages, and it is a theoretical justification of international trade.
