Answer:
B) cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question his attitude change is best explained by cognitive dissonance. This is defined as the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change. Which is exactly what Fernando is experiencing.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Last semester, Brita bought her textbooks over the Internet and saved a considerable amount of money. Classes start in a few days, and she needs to decide right away how and where to purchase her books. Brita will most likely engage in "limited problem solving" process.
<h3>What is limited problem solving process?</h3>
Limited issue solving is another sort of consumer problem-solving that consumers employ when they need information about unknown brands in well-known product categories or when they make sporadic purchases of goods; it takes a fair amount of time for information collecting and consideration.
The characteristics of limit solving process are-
- Limited issue solving is employed when consumers seek information about a new brand within a well-known product category or when they occasionally purchase products.
- When buying a new, expensive, or infrequently purchased goods, consumers engage in lengthy problem solving.
- Possibly when you need to find out information about an unusual brand in a well-known product area, takes a fair amount of time to gather information.
- Clothing is one example where it is known the product class but not the brand.
Therefore, in the given case- Brita lacks the time to thoroughly consider all of his alternatives. Additionally, he will likely follow suit this time around given his recent success purchasing books online (unless he waited too long and cannot receive his books in time).
To know more about steps in the problem solving process, here
brainly.com/question/10708306
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. Larger growth opportunities based on market size
Explanation:
Took the test and guessed it correctly
$60 one year ago. The stock is now worth $70. During the year, the stock paid a dividend of $2.25. The total return to George from owning the stock would be 20% (after rounding off the answer to the nearest whole percent).
- Total return on share is the summation of dividend and price appreciation.
- Since, the dividend = $2.25
- Then, to ascertain price appreciation we need to subtract the dividend from the total return on the share.
- Price appreciation = $70 - $60 = $10
- Total return can be calculated hence.
- Total return = $10 + $2.25 = $12.25
- Therefore, the total return for George was $12.25.
- To round off the answer to the nearest whole percentage:
- Total return percent = $12.25/$60 = 20% approximately
Therefore, the total return to George from owning the stock would be 20%.
Learn more about total returns here:
brainly.com/question/13078425
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A" and "C": An increase in the family's car payment means the family will be unable to afford a vacation; A newer model offers better protection and functions but is more expensive than an older model.
Explanation:
Trade-offs are the result of comparing what must be acquired with what should be given up to satisfy most of a need. While selecting a new vehicle, a family must consider its capacity, size, and price. Besides, they will have to evaluate all the could be left behind for incurring such expenses like buying a new piece of furniture of use of most members of the family, remodeling part of the house or going on a family vacation.