All categories

3 years ago

-4x = 20 Please can you help anything can help

Mathematics

2 answers:

artcher [175]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

x=-5

Step-by-step explantation

You divide both sides by -4

-4=20

20/-4 = -5

So x=-5

enot [183]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

the answer is x=-5. a negative times a negative is a positive.

You might be interested in

what is 9,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 In scientific notation (if possible write in calculator form)

Lunna [17]

Answer:

9 × 10^15

Step-by-step explanation:

take all the zeros count them up and remove them and put it as kinda small next to the number

3 0

4 years ago

How many hours are in 100,000,000 minutes 34 points!!

tatuchka [14]

Divide 100,000,000 by 60

1666666.6667 Hours.

5 0

4 years ago

<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=7y%20%5Ctimes%204x%20-%205x%20%7B%3F%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20" id="TexFormula1" title="7y \times 4x - 5

lapo4ka [179]

The answer is i don’t know or I don’t care and what are we trying to find

5 0

4 years ago

G(g(x)) g=(x+14)/(x+2)

GalinKa [24]

$\bf g(x)=\cfrac{x+14}{x+2}~\hspace{8em}g(~~g(x)~~)=\cfrac{g(x)+14}{g(x)+2}\\\\\\(~~g(x)~~)=\cfrac{~~\frac{x+14}{x+2}+14~~}{\frac{x+14}{x+2}+2}\implies (~~g(x)~~)=\cfrac{~~\frac{x+14~~+14x+28}{x+2}~~}{\frac{x+14~~+2x+4}{x+2}}\\\\\\(~~g(x)~~)=\cfrac{~~\frac{15x+42}{x+2}~~}{\frac{3x+18}{x+2}}\implies (~~g(x)~~)=\cfrac{15x+42}{\underline{x+2}}\cdot \cfrac{\underline{x+2}}{3x+18}\\\\\\(~~g(x)~~)=\cfrac{15x+42}{3x+18}\implies (~~g(x)~~)=\cfrac{3(5x+14)}{3(x+6)}\implies (~~g(x)~~)=\cfrac{5x+14}{x+6}$

6 0

3 years ago

A corporation randomly selects 150 salespeople and finds that 66% who have never taken a self- improvement course would like to

Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

We conclude that there is no difference in the two population proportions using α = 0.05.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a corporation randomly selects 150 salespeople and finds that 66% who have never taken a self- improvement course would like to do so.

The firm did a similar study 10 years ago and found that 70% of a random sample of 160 salespeople wanted a self-improvement course.

Let $p_1 (\pi_1)$ = true proportion of workers who would like to attend a self-improvement course in the recent study.

$p_2 (\pi_2)$ = true proportion of workers who would like to attend a self-improvement course in the past study.

SO, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1=p_2$ {means that there is no difference in the two population proportions}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1\neq p_2$ {means that there is a difference in the two population proportions}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of salespeople who would like to attend a self-improvement course in recent study = 66%

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of salespeople who would like to attend a self-improvement course in past study = 70%

$n_1$ = sample of salespeople in recent study = 150

$n_2$ = sample of salespeople in past study = 160

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.66-0.70)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.66(1-0.66)}{150}+\frac{0.70(1-0.70)}{160} } }$

= -0.755

The value of z test statistics is -0.755.

Now, at 0.05 significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistic lies within the range of critical values of z, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is no difference in the two population proportions.

5 0

3 years ago