Answer:
The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw]. ... Basically, if a federal and state law contradict, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.
I would say C most people go along with what the rest of the people do, if observers didn’t do anything it’s more likely because no one else was.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
A basic premise of the framework is that incidents are generally handled at the lowest jurisdictional level possible. The National response protocols recognize this and are structured to provide additional tiered levels of support when there is need.
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the answer is option C.
rising life expectancy
Explanation:In the early 20th century the United States was experiencing the decline of birth rate. There were many reasons behind this. Like as world war I, the Great depression effect in the economy. But after world war II, USA experienced a great increase in the birth rate during the period of 1946 to 1964. This period is called as the Baby Boom in the history of USA. By the end of 1964, 76.6 million babies were born during the period of baby boom.
There are many reasons behind this massive increase of birth rate. Life expectancy was one of the main reason behind this. The strengthened economical condition of the USA has increased the facilities of the people. As a result couples were more willing to have babies.
Moreover soldiers returned from the world war were given the opportunity of job and social securities.As a result they got married inthe pursue of better and fulfill life. 2.2 millions couple were married in 1946 and most of them were strongly inspired to have baby to accomplish the family.
So it can be said that rising life expectancy was a factor behind the Baby Boom.
Answer:
The doctrine of <u>stare decisis</u> requires courts to follow authoritative prior decisions when ruling on a case.
Explanation:
The answer is stare decisis because it is a principle that states that the same situations should be approach in the same form. According to this, a court has to adhere to the precedent that was established by another court as the decisions that have been taken by a court in the past turn into authority for similar issues that may arise later.
