Answer:
George Washington was a man of extraordinary charisma and talent for leadership. The populace admired and respected him; his fellow soliders and officials did, too; he had dealings with outstanding people of his time who stood higher than he did intellectually level. Nevertheless, he was the leader.
According to a paper by reverend Richard C. Stazesky for the George Washington Club (2000) in Delaware , Washington´s leadership style shows the following characteristics:
- he had a vision of the cause that comprised ideas and goals that would not be changed no matter the circumstances;
- he was skillful in designing and creating an organizational culture that made possible the achievement of the leader´s vision and ideas;
- he was successful in gaining others for the cause by persuading them and by instilling in them his ideas, beliefs and values of his vision.
- as any other successful leader, he effectively combined in himself different roles to be played for the cause.
Explanation:
Answer:
- Political fragmentation
- Lider role
- Making new countries
- Culture role
- Army and bureaucracy role
Explanation:
This term is known as a process of territorial changes, where many different territories are brought together into one state. Different cultures and languages are put aside and many different nations are sharing one language and one territory, speaking in the same language.
The basis of the founder's concerns over the formation of political parties is that the political factions would tear the nation apart.
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
The designer of the Constitution believed that the Political Parties are a necessary evil and they can't avoid it. The Political factions may lead to the Civil War between the groups, so it was essential to design the Constitution keeping that in mind so that the evil effect of the Political Parties don’t spread.
The Constitutional framers were highly concerned about the formation of political parties which drifted England in civil wars of century. These political parties are considered as the corruption of monarchical British System in favor of democratic government.
Answer:
Appreciating Mark's work in the presence of his classmates.
Explanation:
The first one is not a positive reinforcement lol- that would make him embarrassed and he would most likely start to blame himself and lose motivation making the situation more difficult..
Third one- detaining him wont do anything for that situation unless hes talking about ways to help him improve on getting in work on in time.
The last one will make him feel good about himself and will make him want to do better including enhancing his slight mistakes- such as being late. Seems like the only reasonable answer. :)
Cause a country's history is very important . it tells you how they came to be what they are today.