In the context of the Cold War, "containment" was a US strategy, wherein communism would be "contained" in the East. It didn't want communism to spread from the USSR to East European countries, China, Korea, and Vietnam. It was one of the most basic strategies in the Cold War.
Some species of plants and animals flourished in both areas, and some did not. There were many new animals and plants in the Americas that Europeans had never seen. And, Europeans brought plants and animals to the New World that America had never seen. The Colombian Exchange was also a cultural exchange. New agricultural developments were traded, economic activity and opportunities opened up between the New and Old Worlds, and new ideas were exchanged. The ability to grow corn and potatoes. These two starchy foods, high in nutrients kept many Europeans from starving. Some of the things that Native Americans received as a result ofthe Columbian Exchange are as follows: . Horses . Firearms (beginning with muskets) . Textiles to use for clothing and ornamentation (although manySouth American Indigenous Peoples, such as the "Inca," already wereweaving their own textiles at least a century before the arrival ofthe Europeans).
Answer: Austrian mountaineer Ludwig Purtscheller
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could cap contributions to political parties, and thus endorsed the 1974 Act amending the Federal Elections Campaign Act 1971. However, it declared certain parts of the law to be anti-constitutional, to drop the legislated ceiling on the contribution of candidates to their own campaign. Above all, it found the statutory spending limit imposed on political parties in the organization of election campaigns to be contrary to the Constitution: whether the individual restrictions on the amount that could be given to political parties were considered legitimate, in that they led only the parties to broaden their base in order to raise sufficient funds, the ceiling on election expenses itself was annulled on the grounds that it contradicted the 1st Amendment of US Constitution right to freedom of speech.