Answer:
You should buy more shares
Explanation:
The above-mentioned question is missing few components. I have added them to explain on how the question would be solved if all the variables were provided. Please note the additions in bold text below. The answer of which is given afterwards.
You own 300 shares of Somner Resources' preferred stock, which currently sells for $39 per share and pays annual dividends of $5.50 per share. If the market's required yield on similar shares 12% is percent, should you sell your shares or buy more?
Solution as mentioned below:
First of all we need to calculate value of the preferred stock by dividing the annual dividend per share from the market required rate.
Value of preferred stock = 5.50 / 12%
Value of preferred stock = $45.83
Now given the fact that the current price at which the stocks are sold is $39 which is less than the price at which they are actually valued which is $45.83. You should buy more of the shares as they are currently undervalued.
Answer:
The correct answer is predictive validity test.
Explanation:
A predictive validity test is carried out in order to predict the performance that a collaborator will have in the future. With this dynamic, it is ensured that an honest employee is hired, and that he always acts under the rules of the organization to which he will belong. In general, there are discrepancies compared to what many people can do under certain circumstances, and this test is precisely what they want to know about the performance under different scenarios.
Incomplete question. However, I answered from a general research perspective.
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>What role do sources play in validating an argument?</em>
Well, the term source basically refers to the originator of any information. We have sources that are considered <em>credible sources</em> (like Encyclopedia, Journal Magazine, Newspaper, etc) and others that are considered <em>incredible sources </em>(general social media post). Knowing the kind of source could thus help validate an argument.
Relying on the internet to provide complete and truthful information is difficult considering the amount of fake news available today.
Answer:
Increase of 130 million
Explanation:
In this question, we are looking to evaluate what has happened to change in deferred tax assets. We proceed as follows;
Firstly, we calculate the current tax.
Mathematically = 40% of 400 million = 40/100 * 400 million = 160 million
Now, as we can see in the question, a decrease in deferred tax asset resulted in an increase in tax expense to a tune of $50 million
This brings the total tax expense to 160 million + 50 million = 210 million
We can see from the question that the company has only recognized a tax expense of $80 million.
This means that the change in deferred tax asset was an increase of 210 million- 80 million = $130 million
