Answer:
my hand jk a shotgun, lifting waghts your legs your foot your hands while typing
Answer:
Because according to different family the needs of different family differ from each other
Answer:
1. moderates were the early nationalists and radicles were the assertive nationalists.
2. moderates did not want absolute independence but radicles wanted purna swaraj.
3. moderates had full faith in the British empire but radicals had no faith in them.
4. moderates were in favor of the british empire but radicals believed in the supremacy of indian culture.
Explanation:
:)
Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
