Answer:
Part (a) The net income of carter is $115 million.
Part (b) The closing cash balance at the end of year is $360.
Explanation:
Part (a) Net Income Computation:
Sales $825
Cost of goods sold <u>(</u><u>$290</u><u>)</u>
Gross Profit $535
Other Expenses <u>(</u><u>$425</u><u>)</u>
Net income $115 Million
Part (b) The cash balance of Carter is not dependent on non cash flows. So the cash transactions would be considered here for cash balance computation.
Opening Cash position $290
Collection from Sales $710
Inventory Invoices paid ($350)
For Everything <u>($290)</u>
Closing Cash balance $360
Answer:
Cannot, Less
Explanation:
Production efficiency or productive efficiency is the efficient utilization of resources with view to achieving the lowest cost of production. Production efficiency is achieved when an economy is operating on her production possibility curve.
When an economy attained the level of Productive efficiency, it means it can no longer increase production of any commodity without a trade-off for other similar commodity.
Answer:
nonprofit corporation - literally anything involving donations - your welcome
Explanation:
Answer:
36.35%
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows,
Sales = $78,400
Net income = $2,400
Cost of goods sodl = $43,100
Depreciation = $6,800
So, we can calculate the EBIT value by using following formula:
= EBIT ÷ Sales
= ($78,400 - $43,100 - $6,800) ÷ ($78,400)
= $28,500 ÷ $78,400
= 36.35%
Hence, the common-size statement value of EBIT is 36.35%
Answer:
The employee has most likely committed a <u>Horns error</u>.
Explanation:
The horns error occurs when <u>one attribute</u> of an individual (which may be positive or negative), <u>creates a bias that influences how that individual is perceived overall</u>.
<em>If an employee is dissatisfied with his manager's disposition and this dissatisfaction influences the employee to rate the manager low on all performance criteria, then the employee has committed a horns error.</em>