Answer:
Enable them to be productive as well as effective leaders across different political and cultures systems.
Explanation:
Global perspective is something which someone could think regarding a situation as it related to the rest of the world or economy. It is that the person or an individual have a thinking or a perspective which relates to the world.
So, the managers with no operations of foreign of any type, still require a global perspective except which enable them to be productive leaders across the different cultures as well as political systems.
NOTE: Text is missing, but I am providing the direct answer.
Answer:
Proposal A: $185,714.29
Proposal B: $160,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
$10,000 for installations to be completed.
The revenue generated by each unit is $ 20.00
Proposal A:
Fixed costs= 55,000
The variable cost is $13.00
Proposal B:
Fixed costs= 70,000
The variable cost is $10.00
Break-even point (dollars)= fixed costs/ contribution margin ratio
Proposal A: (55,000+10,000)/[(20-13)/20]= $185,714.29
Proposal B: (70,000 + 10,000)/[(20-10)/20]= $160,000
<u>Answer</u>:
<u>True</u>
Explanation:
Indeed, the economics student was mistaken because aggregate demand <em>follows a pattern</em> that when prices rise, consumer wealth declines, the interest rates rise, and exports become more expensive thus leading to a downward sloping of the aggregate demand curve.
Therefore, the second statement is correct (True) for saying the economics student was wrong in his statement.
Answer:
Option B, have the same intercept with a flatter slope; fall.
Explanation:
Option B is correct because a more risk-averse person faces a steeper curve while the less risk-averse person faces a flatter slope. While the more risk-averse person has more return on the stock while the less risk-averse person has less return. Therefore, in the given situation, the SML will have the flatter slope and its return will fall. As it is a less risk-averse investor.
Answer:
An upscale "white-tablecloth" restaurant chain acquires a travel agency.
Explanation:
Few reasons:
- Such restaurant are luxurious, so they would want to collaborate with travel agencies but not acquire the whole agency itself.
- Being the upscale restaurant they have to work on their own image not acquiring unnecessary agencies.
- They have their own customer market, who won't compromise on the choices they make, so they don't need to acquire a travel agency to increase it's branding as not everyone can afford such restaurants.
