because it's got nothing normal to do I don't know what to do and if a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck I couldn't be a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood could be how much would a woodchuck chuck and a woodchuck chuck and a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck would chuck wood
Answer:
I don't know -- Say, do you?
Brightly shining, glistening, too.
Altogether, all to few.
Offering a subtle hue.
Held together just by glue.
Trampled by a wand'ring shoe.
Radiant beams, all askew.
Explanation:
brainliest?
Answer:
To preserve the culture of various groups (Japanese, etc) and to convey a message like moral lesson and etc.
Explanation:
No, the correct way is the boy who hit the home run is the captain of the team
The option that describes a deconstructionist approach to a text is - complicates the meaning of the text. Deconstructionists like to dig deep into the text, and find meanings that aren’t obvious at the first, second, or even the third glance. They like to analyze texts so much that they bear everything within their interpretation, and get to the very core of the text, thus complicating something that would otherwise have been a simple analysis.