The aftermath of the Great Schism was far-reaching. By far the most obvious consequence of the schism was the establishment of canonical division between the Western Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches.
As demonstrated in the Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople in 1204, tensions between Western and Eastern Christians further escalated after the split. This schism established the unique identities of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a major effect of the Great Schism on modern life?</h3>
Generally, The Great Schism had a variety of repercussions as a result. The most obvious and obvious consequence of the split was the official separation of the Eastern Orthodox churches and the Western Catholic churches. This was a significant impact of the schism.
In conclusion, As a result of the split, tensions between Western Christians and Eastern Christians escalated, as seen by events such as the Fourth Crusade and the sacking of Constantinople in 1204. Because of this schism, the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church have always been able to differentiate themselves from one another.
Read more about Great Schism
brainly.com/question/1461104
#SPJ1
The correct answer is: D.
It was an uprising led by the Chief of the Wampanoag against white settlers.
King Phillips War occurred after the death of the Chief of the Wampanoag friendly to the English settlers and the built up anger at the settlers abusing their guest rights.
Thomas Edison invented the most widely available version of the light bulb. With the advent of AC/DC electricity cities soon began to have streetlights. This would make for a good crime deterrent.
Answer: is the season fall or winter??? i am so..confused.
Explanation:
Answer:
<h3>Representatives will be unable to support the rights of the people effectively.</h3>
Explanation:
- Legislative immunity provides senators and representatives the right to speak and state their opinions in the Congress without any fear of arbitrary arrest or defamation.
- This is done not to ensure the interest of the speaker but to protect the voice of the people which the speaker is representing.
- In a democracy the voice of the people is taken into account without fail. Therefore, the need to protect the representatives to speak or state their opinions in the Congress on behalf of the people becomes mandatory.
- If the provision of legislative immunity is not allowed, the essence of democratic process to represent and support the rights of the people would be ineffective.
