Answer: i got the same question and i need help
Explanation:
Answer:
I agree with this statement because when you help outside the nation, it helps the U.S know how to deal with causes like the one you are supporting ,so I agree with this statement. This was my response. I'll put Sample response below. Hope this Helps!
Explanation:
Responses will vary. A sample response follows: Agree: the active American citizen should realize that one of America’s central values is helping people around the world. Therefore, active American citizens should be focused on helping both their communities and people around the world. After all, our world is getting smaller. We can no longer consider other nations as other worlds -- we are connected to them politically and economically. Moreover, helping other nations is easy because there are international organizations such as the American Red Cross that make volunteering simple. Disagree: while active citizenship may include helping people in other countries, the primary responsibilities of an active citizen are their immediate community, local, state, and national affairs. After all, a citizen is not a citizen of the world, but rather a nation. There are plenty of people suffering within American borders and that should be the focus of active American citizens.
It was the "Homesteaders" who moved west in the latter half of 19th century in the United States due mostly to the fact that the federal government made land in the West incredibly cheap, since they wanted to encourage migration and settlement.
They were passed in effort to prohibit certain actions that led to anti- competitiveness
Answer:
Because it lets them have equal say with other states
Explanation:
States with smaller populations favor having a set number of representatives in Congress because it allows them to still have an influence on politics. If representation in a body of power depends on population size, then the states with a larger population will have more representatives, and therefore the interests of the larger states will be pushed more, while the smaller states' voices will be drowned out. Larger states would most likely prefer representation based on population because it gives them more say on politics and because it serves the interests of the majority of the overall population.