Answer:
They know an expert will provide the most accurate information.
Explanation:
They know an eyewitness will be free of personal bias. - This is not correct. Eyewitness reports of historical events will most likely be very much based on personal bias. Eyewitness reports will vary according to the cultural background of the person, where they were during events, their emotional state and stance towards the events, their background knowledge, their participation in the events, and many more.
They know a student who did research will be an accurate source. - This is not true. Historians can’t assume the student research will be the accurate source as students are only learning to do proper research and are expected to still make mistakes.
<u>They know an expert will provide the most accurate information. - This is the correct answer. When starting work, historians assume that experts who did research and examinations before them, and who put down information, are giving accurate accounts.</u> For example, if a historian’s work is based on the material artifact, he or she will assume that the archeologist before them made the best possible account into the explanation and background of the artifact.
They know an eyewitness report will always be truthful. - This is not true. As mentioned before, eyewitness reports are highly subjective, and therefore cannot be taken as true scientific findings.
Answer:Evidence explains the importance of the writers reasons
Explanation:
The best way to improve objectivity in the paragraph is by removing the reference to Garcia-Ruiz being a local businesswoman.
<h3>What is objectivity of paragraph?</h3>
Objectivity refer to a way a writer write a paragraph in which he is not influenced by personal feelings or people character but base on fact.
Therefore, The best way to improve objectivity in the paragraph is by removing the reference to Garcia-Ruiz being a local businesswoman
<h3 />
The question is incomplete, below is the passage gotten from brainly website.
Read the first paragraph from an article in the local online newspaper. Local businesswoman Inés Garcia-Ruiz is joining the race for the state senate seat that is soon to be vacated by retiring senator Benjamin Hall. A long-time resident of this community, Garcia-Ruiz says that, if she is elected, she will "dive into projects that aid low-income families.” This should be obvious to most constituents because she is well known for her impressive charity work. Time and time again, she has worked tirelessly to improve the lives of those living in poverty in our community. What is the best way to improve objectivity in the paragraph? by removing the reference to Garcia-Ruiz being a local businesswoman by removing idioms, such as “dive into” and “time and time again” by eliminating the reference to projects that aid low-income families by eliminating emotional language used to describe the charity work
Learn more about objectivity below.
brainly.com/question/16366562
#SPJ1
