Looking at this in terms of sets, let's call O the set of all owls, and F the set of all things that can fly. What this original statement is saying every animal that's a member of the set of all owls is also a member of the set of all things that can fly, or in other words, O⊂F (O is a subset of F). Negating this tells us that, while there's <em>at least one</em> element of O that also belongs to F, O is not contained entirely in F (O⊆F, in notation), so a good negation or our original statement might be:
<em>Not all owls can fly.</em>
Line b and h because to find radius it half of the diameter of STRAIGHT lines
D.) A polynomial cannot have a variable in the denominator.
Ok, so she started off with $5.00.
She bought milk for $2.99.
She buys bread, which costs $1.50.
Subtracting the money she wasted, the total would be $0.51.
The only thing she could buy is 5 pieces of gum for 25 cents.
Her change will be $0.26.
Hope this helps!
The answer is the letter c. 3
