The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "A. the relationship between the elements of your thought." Parallel structure is used to make clear the relationship between the elements of your thought.
Here are the following choices:
A. the relationship between the elements of your thought
B. the high quality of your writing
C. the subordinate clause structure
Answer:
Using Colin Powell's 2003 pre-war speech to the UN as a case study, this essay illustrates ways in which discourse analytic methods can serve investigations of constitutive rhetoric. Prior to the speech, Powell's reluctance to go to war and his skepticism of the need for military action in Iraq was well known. His conversion to the administration's position was key to the persuasiveness of the speech. Thus, within the speech he needed to reconstitute his ethos from doubter to advocate. The analysis focuses on how specific linguistic qualities such as modality, positioning, narrative, and evaluation assist Powell in doing so. These discourse analytic tools reveal ways in which discrete linguistic moves contribute to the constitutive work of ethos formation and re-formation.
Explanation:
B. Leslie loved clothes and hoped to become a designer, so she quit her jobat the convenience store and moved back to her parents home in Arizona
Answer:
Stevenson wanted to say that this poem was extremely striking and so profound that it can reach very remote points of the human soul.
I believe that the poem is chilling as a whole and that no part stands out, because all its lines are equally striking.
Explanation:
When Stevenson states that "the furthest reaches of disdain and rage ... bereft of all 'normal human feelings," she means that what she has just read is something very strong and loaded with meaning, capable of touching the reader of grandly. That's because the poem is extremely deep and can reach very remote parts of the soul and trigger feelings so strong and obscure that the beds didn't even know they had them.
Answer:
A Rose for Emily" The Narrator's Point of View. "A Rose for Emily" is a successful story not only because of its intricately complex chronology, but also because of its unique narrative point of view. ... In general, the narrator is sympathetic to Miss Emily, never condemning her actions.
Explanation: