Answer:
It would be the senator.
Explanation:
She is not being affected physically; her conflict is within her own mind.
They didn't think much of it. Their was barely a ripple and their was no mention or service for her.
Hope I helped.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
For a question like this, look at the context. Do a search to see if any of the given answers show up in the reading.
Relevant to = relating to. Look at the rest of the reading. Does it fit?
Answer:
If don't have any problem in questoin then why r you asking such type of question which's answer was already given?
I haven't a full answer for you, but here's how I'd suggest you start it:
There's clear evidence of your theme in the lines "When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept."
Reason being: Brutus only <em>told (verbally) </em>the people that Caesar was ambitious, giving <em>no </em>examples that are actual proof of how the great Julius Caesar acted. However, Mark Antony states right off the bat of what Caesar had done in his life-time. Antony decidedly debunks Brutus of any honourable traits as he continues with his Eulogy, as the more Antony says Brutus is "honourable," the more it is hypocritically placed. (<em>What I'm trying to say here is the more Antony says Brutus is honourable, it actually counter-intuitive, Antony is trying to take away any honour the horrible man had.)</em>
