Answer: The Dutch
Explanation: British and Dutch are the only Protestant group. British only settled in America and Canada. It says the Dutch settled in a small area of South Americana’s
A. Region D
Explanation:
The European countries were well known for conquering countries and establishing colonies all over the world, but they made an exception in one, that being China. Instead of make China a colony, the European countries, usually in bad relations, worked together to take over parts of it, as it was in their best interest.
It may seem unthinkable nowadays for someone to divide China in spheres of interest, but back in the 19th and early 0th century, the country was in terrible condition, so it was easy target for the Europeans. The European interest was mainly economic, so instead of going after all of the Chinese territory, the Europeans captured only the Chinese coastline. This was tactically excellent move, as China was still producing a lot, but it had to export the goods through the sea, and with the Europeans controlling the coastline, the Chinese had to sell everything to them for minimum compensation, while the Europeans were making huge profits.
Elizabeth I of England is presented as an example of a ruler who succeeded by religious settlement.
Queen Elizabeth was the last Tudor ruler who reigned on the throne from 1558-1603. Her entire ruling period is considered to be the Golden Age of England. The Elizabethan Era is named after Queen Elizabeth I, who ruled for about 44 years.
When she succeeded the throne, a clash was going on between the Catholics and the Protestants. With her wit and intelligence, Elizabeth I established a stable religious settlement between the two groups and successfully reined on the throne without any religious turmoil.
Queen Elizabeth is considered to be a 'maiden' as she had not married, and her half-sister became the Queen after Elizabeth I.
To learn more about Queen Elizabeth I,
brainly.com/question/14464182
brainly.com/question/10062367
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option E
Explanation:
In simple words, the above case relates to the situation of lack of evidence. For proving an alleged criminal to be the culprit the law requires a full hard core proof after no further questioning regarding guilt of the culprit could be done.
In this case, eye witnesses or video camera recording could have been an aid fr Patty but as she had not presented anything to the court she can do nothing.
Answer: The option that best explains this situation is that Ben found his work to be routine and monotonous.
Of all the options listed above, the option that best explains this situation is the fact that Ben had found his work to be routine and monotonous. The question didn't say Ben felt the hike was monotonous, Ben didn't lack ambition, he wasn't motivated by the prospect of extrinsic rewards, neither was he gunning for a position at the competing firm all along.
The question subtly suggest that his work is routine and monotonous in "Ben has been working as a process executive at an accounting firm for the past two years".
