Answer:
He will recover $70 because he was 30% responsible according to the court.
Explanation:
The Civil Procedure and Remedies Code on its section 33.001 states about proportionate responsibility. And it clearly states that in damages actions the claimant may not recover if it's more than 50% responsible. In the case given Macho is 30% responsible so he would recover 70% of the damages claimed that is the responsibility of the other part. Both parts have a certain degree of responsibility in the claim at the eyes of the court so, they compensate Macho´s claim of $100 according to the percentage the court gave to each one.
I hope this answer helps you.
Incomplete question. The remaining part of the question reads;
The city of Beautifica has established a lovely park in the city. The city council wishes to preserve some elements of nature, undisturbed by city noise, traffic, pollution, and crowding. The park is a place where citizens can go and find grass, trees, flowers, and quiet. In addition, there are playgrounds and picnic areas, and at one time a road ran through the park. Now the road is closed. The city council has enacted a law requiring that all entrances to the park have the following signposted: NO VEHICLES IN THE PARK.
<em>The law seems clear, but some disputes have arisen over its interpretation. Interpret the law in the following cases, keeping in mind what the law says (the letter of the law) as well as the legislative intent. Examine the situation and decide whether or not the vehicle described should be allowed in the park. </em>
Tony lives on one side of the city and works on the other. He will save ten minutes if he drives through the park.
Answer:
<u>Tony should not be allowed.</u>
Explanation:
We can make this conclusion because Tony's reasons constitute part of the reasons why the park was closed from vehicles; in other to be undisturbed by traffic or pollution from vehicles.
Hence, it will be reasonable for Tony to use other means of transportation such as a bicycle to go through the park.
I think the answer is A and D
Answer: When a dispute is made, the merchant reverses the transaction and the customer receives his money back. Chargebacks are meant to protect consumers from unauthorized transactions. Instead of wasting time arguing with suppliers on the legitimacy of a transaction, customers can simply initiate a chargeback transfer.
Answer:
This glossary of Course terms, written by Robert Perry, attempts to clarify the special meaning the Course gives familiar words like God, forgiveness, and miracle. Where applicable, it sets the Course’s meaning alongside the conventional definition and/or the traditional Christian usage. This glossary is keyed to the FIP edition of the Course.
