Answer:
She did not consider the multiplicative inverse property of a real number
Step-by-step explanation:
Jacinta in her conclusion did not consider the Multiplicative Inverse property of real numbers.
Let x be an irrational number.
So, 
If x is an irrational number, then its reverse is also an irrational number. So by the Multiplicative Inverse property their product is 1 and 1 is a rational number. Thus, Jacinta was incorrect.
Answer: 13
Step-by-step explanation:
2x-27=-1
2x=26
X=13
Answer:
mcdonalds
Step-by-step explanation:
For the first one...
1,15
2,30
3,20
and for the second one is the same as the first one.
EXTRA CREDIT:
Week one increases by 15, week two increases by 15 but week three decreases by 15. The total miles ran would be 15 miles
15+15=30 30-15=15 miles
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
If an expression is not dependent on x, it simplified form must not contain x. To show that this is the case for (a) and (b) we need to simplify them and assess:
(a)

Indeed, does not depend on x!
And (b)

Again, does not depend on x.