Answer:
-5000 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
32000 - 27000 = 5000, they descended 5000 feet. So the answer is -5000 :))
Based on my experiences so far, the approach to geometry that I prefer is: Euclidean Geometry. This is because the problems are easy to visualize since they are restricted to two-dimensional planes.
<h3>Which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions?</h3>
The approach that is easier to extend beyond two dimensions is Euclidean Geometry. Again, this is because of how it deals with shapes and visualization of the same.
Take for instance a triangle; it is easy to go from a two-dimensional equilateral triangle to a square pyramid.
<h3> What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other?</h3>
Analytical geometry is a superior technique for discovering objects (points, curves, and planes) based on their qualities in some situations than Euclidean geometry is in others (for example, when employing topography or building charts).
Learn more about Euclidean Geometry at;
brainly.com/question/2251564
#SPJ1
Answer:
Each piece of string is 3 inches long.
Step-by-step explanation:
1 foot equals 12 inches and 12 divided by 4.
Answer: It isnt equivalent.
Step-by-step explanation:
(8*7)+7
56+7
=63
48+7
=55
63 is not equal to 55
in that case... (8*7)+7 doesnt even equal to 48+7 in the first place.
I believe it's c. babysitting
Frankfurters hourly wage: $5.67
Hair Stylist hourly wage: 80/15= $5.33
Babysitting hourly wage: 250/4=62.50/10= $6.25
