1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tankabanditka [31]
2 years ago
10

1. What is the difference between bribery and extortion?

Law
2 answers:
Leno4ka [110]2 years ago
8 0
Bribery is the act of giving, or offering something to get something in return whilst extortion is The practice of obtaining something (especially Money) through force or threats.
rusak2 [61]2 years ago
5 0
Bribery attempts to coerce the target in a positive way while extortion attempts to do so in a negative way
You might be interested in
What most accurately captures a criticism about the requirement to take bar examinations in order to become a licensed lawyer? a
Elan Coil [88]

Answer: The best criticizism is that Bar exams "cost too much and exact great liabilities" Option A is the most correct option

Explanation: Bar exams are used to regulate the number of people that are practical layers. This exam is taken after you've successfully graduated from a law school.

The exam has been designed to favor only the rich, as the poor finds it very difficult to pay the fees involved. The law school is very costly, as the books and course handout are always costly. The exam is too costly that you need a loan that should not be less that $140,000 to complete your studies, leading to big liability to pay off, when you have started practicing. Even when you have passed the exams, you are still meant to pay for your license.

The government should try and subsidize the amount of money been paid for Bar exam, as this will help to increase the boundaries of licensing outstanding layers, thereby creating an equal opportunity chance for the rich and the poor to practice law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Learning reality, responsible behavior, and the ability to distinguish right from wrong
Kryger [21]

Answer:

whats the question?

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
Which branch of government does the cartoonist suggest is the most powerful?
siniylev [52]

Answer:

I'm like 80% sure its judicial.

Explanation:

They have judicial as the referees. I'd assume referees have the most power at a football game.

6 0
3 years ago
What fraction of both houses must vote to override a veto?
barxatty [35]

Answer:

Two thirds of both houses must vote to override a veto.

Explanation:

The word veto comes from Latin and literally means 'forbid'. It is used to denote that a certain party has the right to unilaterally stop a certain piece of legislation. A veto, therefore, provides unlimited power to stop changes, but not to adopt them.

In the United States, the president has the ability to veto legislation that has passed through Congress, but this right is not absolute. A qualified majority of 2/3 of both houses can pass a law, even against a presidential veto; However, if the proposed law has only a simple majority, the president's veto is decisive.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do you call a person that committed murder!!!!!! ;) ⊕
    10·2 answers
  • A Resolução 1.374/11 em seu artigo 1º estabelece nova redação a Estrutura Conceitual para Elaboração e Divulgação de Relatório C
    12·1 answer
  • You answer a call from an existing client who has a hearing in 10 minutes. They are at the court house but they cannot find thei
    9·1 answer
  • The penal code section for sex registration is
    6·1 answer
  • Why are the Miranda Rights important? Write a short paragraph explaining the importance of these rights, both for police and for
    13·2 answers
  • To remedy the higher crash rates among young drivers. Is/are being implemented in several states
    9·1 answer
  • One major strategy of terrorist organizations is to intimidate or coerce civilian populations. What do terrorists expect to gain
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the experience of being a criminal defendant.
    8·1 answer
  • Anyone become my big sister please <br><br><br>myself Aditya Sharma age 16 standard 11 arts​
    13·2 answers
  • At the trial court level, the plaintiff (Beth Smiles) prevails. What is the basis of the defendant’s (Coastal) appeal?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!