Answer:
Athens was a direct democracy in which citizens voted on laws themselves.
Answer:
The opportunity cost in this scenario is the three lost opportunities Harry experiences by deciding to go to his parent's house. The term opportunity cost refers to the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen. The potential gain Harry may have lost by choosing to go to his parents for dinner instead could be relaxation while fishing, His house painting being finished, and time spent with his friends at the birthday party. These all can be considered lost opportunities due to choosing an alternate opportunity, that being dinner at his parents.
Explanation:
Hope this helps if so
pls mark brainliest :D
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
The Sixth Amendment. The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is the part of the Bill of Rights that sets forth rights related to criminal prosecutions. ... The Supreme Court has applied the protections of the Sixth Amendment to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
According to the information provided, it can be inferred that Jimmy Carter made sure that the board was composed of officials in a balanced and impartial manner so that the person's election was made in a fair and meritorious manner (option 4).
<h3>What is merit?</h3>
Merit is a term that refers to the attitude, or action that makes a man worthy of reward or punishment. In principle, merit is linked to the result of good deeds that make a man worthy of appreciation. However, it can be viewed in a positive or negative.
<h3>Importance of merit in democracy</h3>
Merit is an important aspect for modern democracies because the public power is in the hands of representatives elected by the citizens. Therefore, it is assumed that the candidates and those elected to occupy public positions are thereby merits and adequate preparation to carry out those positions.
President Carter guaranteed the protection of the employees to organize the Board of Protection of Merits stating that the members of the board of directors may only be removed from their position if they breach their agreements or act in a way that generates legal cause for their termination.
According to the foregoing, it can be interpreted that the members of the board were not going to act in a corrupt manner to prevent them from being expelled from their position, which contributed to the election of personnel according to their merit (option 4).
Learn more about Jimmy Carter in: brainly.com/question/1064969
