The correct answer is that each case resulted in the Federal government getting more power, in one way or another.
In Marbury v. Madison, the Judicial Branch elbowed its way into establishing the ability to review laws to determine their constitutionality.
In McCulloch v. Maryland, Congress got more power when the Supreme Court ruled that it had implied powers.
In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that states can't get in the way of Congress acting in their role of arbiter of interstate commerce.
The bible says a friend can be more loyal than a (n ) enemy is true I think
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
This question is the complete question:
A result of the Nuremberg trials was that the United Nations
A- Moved to protect war criminals more carefully.
B- Left prosecution of war criminals up to each country.
C- Prevented anyone from using Nazi symbols in the future.
D- Established that genocide was an international crime
The Nuremberg trials were series of trials (13 trials to be specific) conducted in Nuremberg in Germany with the sole aim of prosecuting German military leaders, political officials, and financiers for the crimes they committed during the Second World War, held from 1945 to 1949.
The judges who preside over these trials were from the United Kingdom, France, the Soviet Union, and the United States(countries of the Allies). <u>Nuremberg trials were a milestone for the establishment of permanent international laws, in order to prevent subsequently, any possible genocides and other war crimes </u>and showed that head of state of any nation could be held responsible for any Crimes Against Humanity. At the end of the trials, all except three of the defendants were found guilty; twelve of the accused were sentenced to death and long sentences for other Third Reich leaders.
Answer: 2,4,and 5 is what I have concluded from this viewing. Hope it helps <3
