2: <span>Super PACs support candidates’ campaigns
3: </span><span>Super PACs enable unlimited donations.
4: </span><span>Super PACs have fewer government restrictions.
hope this helps</span>
Answer:
LetFM = number of fronts madeSM = number of seats madeWM = number of wheels madeFP = number of fronts purchasedSP = number of seats purchasedWP = number of wheels purchasedMin8FM + 6SM + 1WM + 12FP + 9SP + 3WPs.t.3FM + 4SM + .5WM 5000010FM + 6SM + 2WM 1600002FM + 2SM + .1WM 30000FM + FP 12000SM + SP 12000WM + WP 24000FM, SM, WM, FP, SP, WP 0
Answer:
Break-even point= 600 units
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The selling price per dozen is $20, variable costs are $14 per dozen, and total fixed costs are $3600.
The break-even point in units is the number of units required to cover for the fixed costs. We need to use the following formula to calculate it:
Break-even point= fixed costs/ contribution margin
Break-even point= 3,600/ (20 - 14)= 600 units
Answer:
C. A stock's beta can be calculated by comparing its returns to the market's returns over some time period because the beta coefficient measures a stock's volatility relative to market.
Explanation:
A stock`s beta is a risk assessment metric that is used to measure the volatility of a security in relation to the market. The metric compares the risk of an investment with the average market risk of that investment.
Since stock`s beta measures market risk in relation to the security, it can be calculated by comparing its returns to the market`s returns over some time period which gives beta coefficient as a result.
If beta coefficient is above 1, it means the volatility of the security is high. If it`s 1, it means the security risk equals the market risk. If it is below 1, it means the security risk is less than the market risk.
Other options are wrong.
Option A is wrong because security`beta measures security risk in relation to the market, not other securities. Option B is wrong because stock`s beta is more relevant to an investor with well-diversified portfolio to measure risks across market.
Option D is wrong because returns can be negatively correlated without any of the firm having negative beta
Option E is wrong because holding an individual stock is always riskier than combining stocks in a portfolio.
So only option C is right as described above.
