The defenders of slavery had passed the arguments used to challenge the system.
Explanation:
The arguments used to challenge this system are
Some people in the south argued that slavery was actually good for the slaves. Many of them believed that slaveholders providing these 'lesser beings' with religion, sustenance and shelter was an act of kindness towards them.
Equally, many in the south believed that slavery was preferable to the factory work and people can do in the north.
Most of the people were worried that without slavery, the economy would crumble. Several elements of trade and production were reliant upon slavery, and so many southerners argued that slavery could not be abolished, in the interest of prosperity.
In colonial America, Africans "contributed" to society by being a source of income for people who bought and sold them into slavery. They also contributed by being laborers in the southern plantations.
Women contributed to the society by being a house wives --meaning they took care of the house-- as well as cooking meals for the family and taking care of the children.
Native Americans, in the earlier days, contributed by trading with settlers and teaching them how to do things in their environment.
(Sorry I really don't know what the children did)
Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britain’s policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. Most closely associated with British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, it is now widely discredited as a policy of weakness
I would go with answer
B: They both relied on each other for goods and services.
