Answer:
Tendency to engage in charity is strongest for religious individuals were religious behavior is a matter of personal choice.
Explanation:
A religious individual
This is often refered to as someone who tries in every possible way to live his or her life in accordance with his or her faith. Those who regularly engages in religious activities is termed "religious".
Religion
This is often known as an organized and collective belief or faith system.
Intrinsic religiosity
This kind of religiosity deals with the fact that it is an individual's primary motive in life and it is the driving force in their life while Extrinsic religiosity is religiosity motivated by external, non-religious rewards.
Helping is the act of rendering assistance to fellow human being especially those of the same faith.
Religion is not enforced but mostly a matter of personal choice. One can decide to be in it or not. Religious people most times are actively involved in charity so as to render help,draw people to their faith or make the world a better place.
Answer:
<em>Christianity was spread through the Roman Empire by the early followers of Jesus.</em>
Explanation:
<em>The contemporary Catholic Church says that it is the continuation of the early Christian community established by Jesus. Christianity spread throughout the early Roman Empire despite persecutions due to conflicts with the pagan state religion.</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
