According to Albert Barnes, their mistake was that they didn't speak against slavery. Although many of them believed that slavery was against god and against the idea that god made everyone equal, they didn't do much against it out of many reasons, either they thought it was a necessary evil or they were afraid of the public reaction.
Answer:
The cause of World War I, which made the aforementioned items transferred to alliances, imperialism, militarism, nationalism was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary. When Russia began to prepare for WW1 due to the alliance with Serbia, Germany declared war on Russia.
The Einsatzgruppen were used by the military to gather Jews nearing the end of the war
Answer:
Yorktown
<h2>
What made the Battle of Yorktown significant?</h2>
There were three British armies in the US at the time. One was in New York, an island that the British Navy had protected from invasion. The French declaration of war had greatly aided the Continental Army's pursuit of them there in 1778, which prevented them from landing nearby.
Georgia and South Carolina each had the southern garrison force. The southern Continental Army had recently engaged in two engagements and a siege. All of them were won by the British, but only after they had stripped the garrisons of their weapons and supplies while the local militias had destroyed the garrisons (as planned). The "victorious" British discovered that they only held<em> Charleston </em>and <em>Savannah</em>, both of which were under siege.
The last mobile army the British possessed was in action, essentially frightening the countryside and inflaming the already hostile local populace. Cooperation between the US and France had always ended in failure, but at<em> Yorktown,</em> the French more than made up for it by contributing two fleets and the majority of the troops.
The British had no mobile forces after <em>Yorktown</em>, and in fact, the garrisons in <em>Savannah</em> and <em>Charleston</em> were evacuated by ship to support New York. George Hanover wanted to continue the struggle and enlist more soldiers, but nobody else in government was that dim. It was obvious that the<em> best </em>course of action was to work out a separate peace with the US before defeating the <em>French, Spanish, and Dutch</em>. that they did.
Thank you,
Eddie
What might explain the fact that the Chavin and Nazca use underground aqueducts to transport water is that Chavin's technology likely influenced the later Nazca.
The ancient Chavin civilization was a pre-Inca civilization that arose in Peru in the year 1500 BC to 300 BC. Its economy was based on gathering, hunting, fishing and agriculture.
The Chavin people's underground aqueducts were developed as a hydraulic technique to improve agricultural practice.
The Nazca were an ancient civilization that developed in Peru around 100 BC. As a highlight, we can mention the mathematical and architectural knowledge of this people, who built great religious temples.
The Nazca economy was also based on agriculture, and they developed the system of underground aqueducts to transport water as a direct influence of the Chavin culture, which was the civilization prior to the Nazca civilization.
Therefore, the correct alternative is:
- The technology of the Chavin likely influenced the later Nazca.
Learn more about Nazca here:
brainly.com/question/1580196
