Answer:
1. between-subjects
Explanation:
Between-subjects experiment: In psychological or scientific research, the term between-subjects experiment is one of the types of experimental design whereby the subjects or participants of an experiment or research are being assigned under different conditions and therefore each subject or participant will experience only one experimental condition.
The between-subject design is being widely used in the field of social science.
In the question above, the given statement represents the between-subjects experiment.
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the main misconception with Mason's perception is that Congress enacts tax legislation almost every year and this causes changes to be added to the code. Since the last huge change was in 1986, the subsequent small changes were all added into the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Answer:
a. body dysmorphic
Explanation:
Body Dysmorphic Disorder by definition can be a
Preoccupation with some imagined defect in appearance in a normal-appearing person.
Some with a body dysmorphic disorder can always care less over time.
BDD Prevalence is about 1% of population.
The Gender who are more concerned about it is women over men. It is slightly more common in women than men.
It begins to arise as a concern by early adolescence through twenties.
Someone who is suffering from BDD is more concerned about specific body parts.
The features of BDD are ;
1. Frequent mirror checking
2. Often worried that others are looking and making fun of their supposed defect
3. Reassurance seeking
4. Could care less about another real physical defect
Chester from the definition and features of BDD outlined here, clearly shows signs that he is suffering from BDD.
Answer:
The answer is C The difference between the value of the camera accepted and its value if it had been as warranted, medical costs for treating the grandfather's burns, and the cost to replace the grandfathers coat.
Explanation:
(C)When a buyer accepts goods that turn out to be defective, he may recover as damages any "loss resulting in the normal course of events from the breach," which includes the difference between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, plus incidental and consequential damages. Incidental damages resulting from the seller's breach include expenses reasonably incurred in inspection, receipt, and transportation, care, and custody of goods rightfully rejected. In this case, the grandfather incurred no incidental damages. Consequential damages resulting from the seller's breach include any loss resulting from general or particular requirements and needs of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise, and injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty. Here, the grandfather is entitled to breach of warranty damages for the loss of the camera—the difference between the value of the camera accepted and its value if it had been as warranted—plus damages for injury to his person (e.g., medical costs for treating the grandfather's burns) and property (i.e., the cost to replace his coat) because they were proximately caused from the breach of warranty. Thus, (C) is correct, and (A) and (B) are wrong. (D) is wrong because the cost of hiring the professional photographer was not foreseeable. The seller was not told of any particular requirements and needs of the grandfather at the time of contracting nor would the seller have reason to know that the grandfather planned to use the camera to take pictures of his grandson's graduation and would hire a professional photographer if he lost the use of the camera.
The best cause is erosion creating waves and pushing forward the line where the sand starts
