1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timofeeve [1]
3 years ago
10

Someone plz help me giving brainliest

History
2 answers:
elixir [45]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

1. Why did you eat the chip dip and olives so close to lunchtime?

2. Have you ever drawn an animal on the mural yet?

4. The meaning of this is that the cost was very cheap and it wasn't that expensive.

5. Ben creates.

Brainliest appreciated

pickupchik [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1. Why did you eat the chip did and olives so close to lunchtime?

2.Have yo

You might be interested in
Question The sun does not heat up the polar regions because the rays hit the earth
Wittaler [7]
I think it’s at a slant, because earth is on its axis
5 0
3 years ago
Why was the Compromise of 1850 considered a failure? A. Jim Crow laws were enacted in the South. B. Women still could not vote f
WINSTONCH [101]

C) The American Civil War started ten years later and the compromises were intended to prevent this.

8 0
3 years ago
Five days following the meeting at Appomattox, putting an end to the war, what occurred?
Andrew [12]
The answer to the question is D
4 0
3 years ago
Federalist identify teh basic arguments for and against ratification of the constitution
bekas [8.4K]
Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states. 

Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists. 

Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.  
</span><span>
</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Please help me it’s for a grade
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Since Congress had no means to enforce its laws, the states could simply ignore national laws without fear of retribution.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What caused the decline of the Aryana
    8·2 answers
  • The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was signed into law in what year?
    8·2 answers
  • How did Kennedy show his support for African American equality? Check all of the boxes that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • What are the benefits of using repeated trials and<br> replication in a scientific investigation?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was one of the two issues involving slavery in the constitution
    7·1 answer
  • Plz answer these questions will give brainliest
    15·1 answer
  • Why would people want a limited government?
    12·2 answers
  • Based on the Congress party representation charts, how might third-party members have contributed to the gridlock that gripped C
    10·1 answer
  • Who controlled the budget in the roman empire
    13·1 answer
  • Why does Thoreau not want people to pay taxes?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!