1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
motikmotik
3 years ago
14

What did George Washington say about political parties in his Farewell Address of 1796?

History
2 answers:
Ipatiy [6.2K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

\boxed {\boxed {\sf The \ country \ should \ avoid \ political  \ parties \ because \ they \ are \ dangerous \ and \ divisive }}

Explanation:

Since George Washington was the first United States President, he set many precedents and gave advice for the future leaders.

In his Farewell Address, he provided guidance for the future of the nation. One of the main points was about <em>political parties</em>. Towards the end of his term, the Federalist and Republican Parties were forming. He worried that parties would be the worst enemy for the country. He believed citizens would vote according to party loyalty instead of the best choice for the whole nation.

Overall, he believed <u>political parties would harm and divide the nation</u>, so the country should <u>avoid them</u>.

vredina [299]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

George Washington advised American citizens to view themselves as a cohesive unit and avoid political parties and issued a special warning to be wary of attachments and entanglements with other nations

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What motives did the two superpowers have for fighting surrogate wars
Ber [7]
"Surrogate wars" also known as "proxy wars" are wars fought in a third country. The US and the Soviet Union were fighting each other in, for example, Afghanistan and Vietnam.

They preferred proxy wars, because they came without civilian victims of  own population and without  a distraction of the infrastructure of their own countries. In short, the two powers could compete militarily with each other without suffering the worst effects of the wars - this situation allowed them to try to defeat the other one without much risk to their own population.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did increases in employment levels for women, children, and immigrants contribute to the growth of labor unions in the late
Fittoniya [83]

The use of women, children and immigrant allowed industrialists and factory owners to keep wages low for native born men. This was an important catalyst for the organization of labor unions, Children often worked long hours for low pay. The same was true of women and immigrants.

7 0
3 years ago
One result of the Louisiana territory (1803) was that the United States
Phantasy [73]

It doubles the United States.

4 0
3 years ago
16. Describe two benefits and two challenges of transitioning to a democratic form of government.
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:n modern political thought, there are two approaches to the justification of democracy as the best system of government: value-based and rationally utilitarian. Value justifications regard democracy as a value in itself, as a political system that most fully embodies the most important humanistic values: freedom, equality, justice, etc.

The value approach is criticized primarily for its appeal to a democratically minded person who is truly striving for freedom and political equality. However, in the modern world, very many people, if not most, prefer not freedom (which they often perceive even as anti-value), but material well-being, security, and order. Therefore, they put a non-political, social meaning in the most respected values ​​of equality and justice, linking them to ensuring equal opportunities in life or rewarding merit, to which real democracy has a very weak relationship. All this casts doubt on the value group of arguments in favor of democracy.

A rational-utilitarian approach does not deny the certain significance of the value justifications of democracy, but at the same time pushes them to the background. This approach interprets democracy primarily as the most rational, useful way for citizens to organize a political system, allowing them to articulate and harmoniously combine their interests. The most consistently rational-utilitarian group of arguments is expressed in the systemic justifications of democracy: Democracy helps to prevent the rule of dictators, curb power, guarantee the protection of citizens from state arbitrariness; Democracy provides a higher level of economic development and higher rates of economic growth.

Of course, democracy, like any other political system, is not free from serious shortcomings, which, in fact, represent a continuation of its merits. Usually attention is paid to the following weaknesses of democracy:

1. The threat of destabilization of the political system arising from the very principle of election.

2. Political competition can result in conflict ogenicity, confrontation, open clashes and, therefore, destabilization of the situation in society.

3. The danger of the tyranny of the majority, confident in its "rightness" and suppressing the will of those who remain in the minority.

4. Possible unprofessionalism of officials elected by an incompetent majority.

Explanation:

Explanation: answer is more to the bottom

8 0
3 years ago
In at least two paragraphs, discuss whether you believe the framers of the U.S. Constitution created a democracy.
kipiarov [429]
<span>Certainly not. The United States has never, since its founding, consisted of a small number of citizens, still less of citizens that could practically assemble in one place at one time and debate their actions. A pure democracy in this classical Greek city-state sense was never practical, and was not seriously considered.
 
What the Framers created was a constitutional representative republic. Sovereignty is vested in the people, like a democracy (and unlike a constitutional monarchy), but the people do not rule directly. Instead, they elect representatives, at regular intervals, and these rule in the peoples' stead. Their powers are limited, first, by the fact that they are elected for only short terms, and must be re-elected if they wish to continue in power, and secondly, and much more importantly, by the Constitution itself, which puts express written limits on their powers even between elections.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the of the functions of government and explain why they are important. (I need an essay)
    5·1 answer
  • 3 levels of Sumerian society
    12·1 answer
  • Which source would be most likely to provide expert information on the Sioux tribes of Montana from 1800 to present day?
    8·2 answers
  • The highest authority in the United States is the Constitution, because of the supremacy clause Constitution, because of the enu
    7·2 answers
  • How did the Doctrine of Nullification uphold the founding principles? It was based on by the people, for the people. It was base
    12·2 answers
  • What similarities do you see today between the world today and the world today and the world prior too WW1 &amp; WW2 ?
    5·1 answer
  • Okay I need an essay about this book spies by Marc Favreau if u read it please help me !! I will report you if u put a link ????
    15·1 answer
  • Based on this expert what can you conclude about the Inca government
    6·1 answer
  • D. How would you modify the military reductions portion of the Treaty of Versailles?
    6·1 answer
  • I need the answer for 22 and the word ends with a d
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!